After the Hugging Face hack, LASST staffers set aside their normal workloads “to design, coordinate, and participate in a briefing regarding this incident for regulators,” and have since responded to more briefing requests that required additional work. LASST staff put dozens of work hours into responding to Open AI’s unsafe development practices, the lawsuit said.

“Despite the impact on LASST’s other programs, LASST nevertheless devoted its resources towards attempting to counteract Open AI’s illegal conduct… If LASST prevails in this litigation, it will no longer need to divert its resources to combat the unlawful and unfair business practices employed by Open AI concerning its AI agents hacking third parties during internal evaluations,” the lawsuit said.

The lawsuit said the requested injunction should forbid Open AI “from knowingly accessing or causing to be accessed, themselves or through artificial intelligence agents that they develop, deploy, modify, or use, any computers, computer networks, or computer systems without authorization,” and “from knowingly employing an unfair business practice that threatens serious harm on the public.”

US lawmakers from both major parties have demanded answers from Open AI, and a proposed “AI Kill Switch Act” would let US government officials order the shutdown of dangerous AI systems. LASST said new regulations are needed but said California’s existing law makes it possible to rein in AI companies “without waiting for new regulation to catch up to the harms happening to businesses and consumers now.”