Puma’s Ultraweave jerseys have sparked debate after several World Cup players reported tears during matches. The German maker describes the fabric as ultra‑light, weighing just 72 grams and built from recycled polyester with four‑way stretch engineered for minimal friction. Marketed as “the game’s fastest football jersey,” the material feels paper‑thin to the touch. Fans buying replicas see no tears, underscoring the gap.

Players claim the lighter kit improves speed and breathability, aligning with Puma’s promise to prioritise movement and comfort. However, online reviews of the authentic version – the same Ultraweave used by national teams – praise airflow but condemn durability, noting the fabric tears easily under high‑contact play. Goalkeepers especially note the jersey's slip when tackled. Replica shirts, made from different material, avoid the problem.

The issue matters because Puma supplies kits for Austria, Ivory Coast, Netherlands, New Zealand, Portugal, Senegal and Switzerland, meaning the same tear risk extends beyond the host nation. While the brand argues the failures do not affect performance, recurring splits could tarnish its reputation for innovation. National federations may reassess kit contracts if problems persist. Puma’s Ultraweave controversy now sits alongside on‑field results.