HeadlinesBriefing HeadlinesBriefing 12 languages

Ray-Ban Meta Audio glasses review: No camera, no problem

Engadget ·

🇬🇧 English

Normal-looking glasses with solid audio and way better battery life is a win for everyone. Karissa Bell for Engadget RATING : 8.5 / 10Pros Lightweight and comfortable Frame styles look more like "normal" glasses Massively improved battery life Cons Action button isn't that useful Privacy concerns are still a thing Meta's audio-only smart glasses couldn't have come at a more opportune time. At a moment when there's increasing backlash against the company's growing lineup of camera-enabled glasses, the Ray-Ban Meta Audio frames ditch the feature most associated with "creep glasses." Instead, as the name implies, the frames are all about making the most of audio.

The result is a pair of glasses that are lighter, more comfortable and have far better battery life than any other glasses from the company. They also look a lot more subtle and are the closest to "normal" glasses we've seen from Meta. New style, better fit Meta has two different frame styles for its $349 audio-only glasses: Burbank, which looks a bit like a thinner Wayfarer, and Clubmaster, an immediately recognizable Ray-Ban design.

I opted for the latter because it comes in a wider variety of colors and I prefer thinner frames in general. From the front, I'm not sure anyone would recognize the glasses as having any tech abilities. My frames did have the transparent arms Meta often uses to display the inner circuitry of the glasses, but it's still relatively subtle.

Karissa Bell for Engadget There isn't a camera or front-facing LED, but the setup is overall similar to Meta's other glasses. The right arm still has a touchpad for controlling volume, answering calls and other functions, and there's a small inward-facing LED for notifications. There's also a tiny action button, which you can use as a dedicated shortcut for certain features.

It might seem like Meta simply stripped down its existing glasses designs, but the company's VP of Wearables, Ming Hua, told me that the company actually had to rebuild the speaker and microphone setup to work on a smaller frame. That work definitely paid off. The audio-only glasses are noticeably slimmer than other models.

They also fit better and are far more comfortable because less of the weight sits toward the front of the frames. At 47 grams, the Clubmaster glasses are only 2 grams lighter than the Ray-Ban Meta Optics frames, but they feel significantly lighter because they put less pressure around my nose. Karissa Bell for Engadget If you've read my past reviews of other Meta-branded glasses, you know I often struggle with getting a good fit.

Most of the frame styles feel like they are meant for faces just a bit wider than my own, and the weight tends to cause them to slip around my face. But the Ray-Ban Meta Audio glasses have traditional notepads that actually stay in place. You can also get the tips adjusted by an optician (Meta also provides this service at its retail stores and pop-ups as well), but these actually fit me well out of the box without any tweaks.

I wore them for several long stretches and actually forgot I was wearing smart glasses because they felt so much like my typical shades. No camera, (mostly) the same AILike other recent glasses from Meta, the audio-only frames have 6 mics and open-ear speakers. Music, podcasts and phone calls sounded just as good as my Gen 2 glasses.

One quirk of the audio-only glasses is that the microphones are in slightly different places. There are now two mics on the front of the frames, replacing the ones that were embedded in the nosepads in previous models. The other four are on the arms.

This new placement didn't seem to affect things, though. Friends and family told me I sounded clearer on calls when I was wearing the audio glasses, compared with my second-gen Air Pods Pro. The other major advantage the audio-only glasses have compared with other models is the battery life.

Meta says the frames can go 12 hours on a charge with "mixed use" and up to six hours of continuous aud...

View original article →


🇸🇦 العربية

مراجعة Ray-Ban Meta Audio: لا كاميرا، صوت ممتاز

نظارات تبدو عادية، صوت متين وعمر بطارية أطول بكثير، فوز للجميع.Karissa Bell لـ Engadget التقييم: 8.5 / 10

المزايا: خفيفة الوزن ومريحة. أنماط الإطار تبدو أكثر مثل "نظارات عادية". عمر بطارية محسن بشكل كبير

العيوب: زر الفعل ليس له فائدة كبيرة. لا تزال مخاوف الخصوصية قائمة. في وقت تزداد فيه المقاومة ضد مجموعة الشركة المتزايدة من النظارات المزودة بكاميرا، Ray-Ban Meta Audio تتخلى عن الميزة الأكثر ارتباطًا بـ "نظارات التجسس". كما يشير الاسم، فإن الإطارات كلها عن الاستفادة القصوى من الصوت. النتيجة هي زوج من النظارات أخف وزناً، أكثر راحة، وعمر بطارية أطول بكثير من أي نظارات أخرى من الشركة. كما أنها تبدو أكثر تواضعاً وهي الأقرب إلى "النظارات العادية" التي شاهدناها من Meta.

أسلوب جديد، ملاءمة أفضل

لدى Meta نمطين مختلفين من الإطارات لنظاراتها الصوتية فقط بسعر 349 دولار: Burbank، التي تشبه Wayfarer أكثر نحافة، و Clubmaster، تصميم Ray-Ban المعترف به فوراً. اخترت الثاني لأنه يأتي بمجموعة wider من الألوان وأفضل الإطارات الرفيعة بشكل عام. من الأمام، لست متأكداً من أن أي شخصwould recognize النظارات كأنها تمتلك أي قدرات تقنية. my frames did have the transparent arms Meta often uses to display the inner circuitry of the glasses, but it's still relatively subtle.Karissa Bell لـ Engadget

لا تزال الذراع اليمنى لديها لوحة لمس لضبط الصوت، الإجابة على المكالمات وغيرها من الوظائف، وLED داخلي صغير موجه نحو الداخل للإشعارات. يوجد أيضاً زر فعل صغير، يمكن استخدامه ك shortcut مخصص لبعض الميزات. يبدو أن Meta لقد تبسيطت فقط تصاميمها الحالية من النظارات، لكن نائب الرئيس Wearables Ming Hua أخبرني أن الشركة كان عليها فعلياً إعادة بناء مجموعة المتحدثات والميكروفونات لتعمل في إطار أصغر. هذا العمل بالتأكيد ثماراً. النظارات الصوتية فقط noticeably slimmer من الطرازات الأخرى. كما أنها تناسب بشكل أفضل وأكثر راحة لأن وزن أقل يجلس أمام الإطارات. وزن 47 جرام، eyeglasses Clubmaster فقط 2 جرام أخف من Ray-Ban Meta Optics الإطارات، لكنها تشعر أخف بكثير لأنها تضغط أقل حول أنفي.Karissa Bell لـ Engadget

إذا كنت قد قرأت مراجعاتي السابقة لنظارات Meta الأخرى، فأنت تعلم أنني غالباً ما أواجه صعوبة في الحصول على ملاءمة جيدة. معظم أنماط الإطار تبدو مصممة لوجوه مجردة bit wider من وجهي، والوزن يميل إلى جعلها تنزلق على وجهي. ولكن Ray-Ban Meta Audio eyeglasses actualy have traditional notepads that stay in place. يمكنك أيضاً الحصول على نصائح مضبوطة من Optician (Meta أيضاً يوفر هذه الخدمة في متاجرها التجارية ونقاط البوب-أب كذلك)، ولكن هذه actually me تناسب جيداً من الصندوق دون أي تعديلات. لقد ارتديتها لفترات طويلة عدة مرات، و فعلا نسيت أنني أضع نظارات ذكية لأنها شعرت حقاً مثل نظاراتي العادية.

لا كاميرا (معظمها) AI

مثل النظارات الأخيرة من Meta، الإطارات الصوتية فقط لديها 6 ميكروفونات ومكبرات صوت open-ear. الموسيقى، البودكاست والمكالمات الهاتفية صوتت كما فعلت نظارات Gen 2ي. خيار غريب من النظارات الصوتية فقط هو أن الميكروفونات في أماكن slightly مختلفة. الآن هناك ميكروفونان في الأمام من الإطارات، replacing ones that were embedded in the nasopads in previous models. الباقي أربعة على الأذرع. هذا الوضع الجديد لم يبدو أنه يؤثر على الأشياء، على الرغم من ذلك. الأصدقاء والعائلة أخبروني أنني صوتت أوضح على المكالمات عندما كنت أضع النظارات الصوتية، بالمقارنة مع ثاني Air Pods Pro. الميزة الكبرى الأخرى التي تمتلكها النظارات الصوتية فقط مقارنة بالطرازات الأخرى هي عمر البطارية. Meta تقول إن الإطارات يمكنها الذهاب 12 ساعة مع "استخدام مختلط" وأقصى ستة ساعات من التشغيل الصوتي المستمر...

هل تستحق Ray-Ban Meta Audio الشراء؟

نعم، للمستخدمين الذين يفضلون جودة الصوت، الراحة، والخصوصية على ميزات الكاميرا، تقدم Ray-Ban Meta Audio أداء قوياً بعمر بطارية 12 ساعة وتصميم خفي يشبه النظارات العادية.

العربية version →


🇧🇩 বাংলা

Ray-Ban Meta Audio চশমার পর্যালোচনা: কোনো ক্যামেরা নহে, শুনতে ভালো

সাধারণ দৃশ্যের চশমা, সুনির্দিষ্ট সাউন্ড এবং অনেক বেশি ব্যাটারি লাইফ, সবার জন্য বিজয়।Karissa Bell for Engadget রেটিং: 8.5 / 10

ফ avantage: হালকা এবং সুবিধাজনক। শৈলী ফ্রেম দেখে "নর্দার চশমা" মতো। ব্যাটারি লাইফে উল্লেখযোগ্য উন্নয়ন

কনস: এক्शন বাটন খুব উপযোগী নহে। গোপনীয়তা সম্পর্কিত সমস্যা এখনও আছে। যখন কোম্পানির ক্যামেরা-enabled চশমার সিরিজে বাড়তি প্রতিক্রিয়া হচ্ছে, তখন Meta-এর শুধু অডিও smart চশমা আরও উপযোগী সময় নেই। ক্যামেরা বৈশিষ্ট্য থেকে জুড়িত "spy glasses" বৈশিষ্ট্য ছাড়াই, Ray-Ban Meta Audio চশমা সেই বৈশিষ্ট্য ছাড়াই দেয়। নামের মতো, এই চশমার মূল্য হলো সাউন্ডের সর্বোত্তম ব্যবহার। ফলস্বরূপ, অন্য কোম্পানির চশমা থেকে তুলনামূলকভাবে হালকা, আরও সুবিধাজনক এবং আরও দীর্ঘ ব্যাটারি লাইফের চশমা। এগুলোও আরও গোপনীয় এবং আমরা Meta থেকে দেখেছি "নর্দার চশমা" এর কাছাকাছি।

নতুন শৈলী, ভালো ফিট

Meta তার 349 ডলারের শুধু অডিও চশমার জন্য দুটি আলাদা ফ্রেম স্টাইল প্রদান করে: Burbank, যা একটি thinner Wayfarer মতো দেখে, এবং Clubmaster, একটি চখাৎ চখার Ray-Ban ডিজাইন। আমি দ্বিতীয়টি নির্বাচন করেছি কারণ এটি বড় variedad of colours এ এবং আমি সাধারণত thinner ফ্রেম পছন্দ করি। সামনের দিক থেকে, আমি নিশ্চিত নহে কেউ চশমার কোনো টেকনোলজি ক্ষমতা চেনে পারবে। আমার ফ্রেমে Meta অक्सের ব্যবহার transparent arms দিয়ে আর্নসাইট সির্কিট দেখাতে হয়, কিন্তু এটা এখনও relatif সাবলিশ।Karissa Bell for Engadget

ডান অর্ধেরে still আছে volume কন্ট্রোল, কॉलস উত্তর দিতে এবং অন্যান্য ফাংশন জন্য টাচপ্যাড, এবং নোটিফিকেশন জন্য একটি ছোট inward-facing LED। এর lisäksi, একটি ছোট action button আছে, যা কিছু ফিচার জন্য dedicated shortcut হিসেবে ব্যবহার করা যেতে পারে। মনে হতে পারে Meta শুধু এর present glasses ডিজাইন সরল করল, কিন্তু Wearables-এর VP, Ming Hua, আমাকে বলেছে কোম্পানির skuteভাবে smaller ফ্রেমে কাজ করার জন্য স্পিকার এবং মাইক্রোফোন সেটআপ পুনর্নির্মাণ করতে হয়। এই কাজ অবশ্যই ফল দিয়েছে। শুধু অডিও চশমা, অন্য মডেলের তুলনামূলকভাবে বেশি সংকুচিত। এগুলো আরও ভালো ফিট এবং আরও সুবিধাজনক কারণ কম_weight_frontে ফ্রেমের দিকে বসে। 47 গ্রামের weight Clubmaster চশমা, Ray-Ban Meta Optics চশমা থেকে মাত্র 2 গ্রাম হালকা, কিন্তু তারা অনেক বেশি লাইট মনে হয় কারণ নাকের চেড়া কম প্রেসার দেয়।Karissa Bell for Engadget

যদি আমার প 과거 Meta-ব্র্যান্ডেড চশমার পর্যালোচনা পঠন করেছি, তবে আপনাকে पता चलेगा আমি অक्स ভালো ফিট পাওয়ায় অक्स সমস্যার সম্মুখীন হয়। বড় মেjority ফ্রেম স্টাইল মাত্র আমার চেহারের চেড়ে কিছুটা wider লাগে, এবং_weight因ে তাদের আমার চেহারে ফিসলে পড়ে। কিন্তু Ray-Ban Meta Audio চশমা skuteভাবে traditional notepads দিয়ে আসে যা জায়গায় বসে থাকে। আপনি optics-বিশেষজনের দ্বারা tipsও পেতে পারেন (Metaও তার রিটেইল স্টোর এবং pop-ups-এ এই সার্ভিস প্রদান করে), কিন্তু এগুলো বOX থেকে বের হওয়ার পর মাত্র আমার জন্য ভালো ফিট হয় tanpa কোনো tweaks। আমি একে অনেক দীর্ঘ সময় ধরে পরহেজ করেছি এবং বাস্তবে ভুলে গেছি যে আমি smart চশমা পরহেজ করছি কারণ তারা আমার সাধারণ shades মতো অনুভব করছে।

ক্যামেরা নহে (অধিকাংশ) AI

অন্য recents Meta চশমার মতো, শুধু অডিও ফ্রেমে 6 মাইক্রোফোন এবং open-ear speakers আছে। সঙ্গীত, podcasts এবং phone calls সাউন্ড আমার Gen 2 চশমার মতোই ভালো লাগে। শুধু অডিও চশমার একটি quirk হলো মাইক্রোফোনের placement slightly different। এখন ফ্রেমের সামনে দুটি মাইক্রোফোন আছে, যা previous models-তে embedded nasopads-তে মাইক্রোফোন বদলে দেয়। বাকি চারটি arms-তে আছে। এই নতুন placement কিছু প্রভাব ফলস্বরূপ নহে, হালांकि। বন্ধু এবং পরিবার আমাকে বলেছে যখন আমি Audio glasses পরহেজ করছি তখন আমি second-gen Air Pods Pro তুলনামূলকamente clearer সুনির্দিষ্ট audition পায়। শুধু অডিও চশমার অন্য মডেলের তুলনামূলকamente biggest advantage হলো ব্যাটারি লাইফ। Meta দাবি করে ফ্রেম mixed use-তে 12 ঘণ্টা পর্যন্ত চলতে পারে এবং連続 aud...

Ray-Ban Meta Audio চশমা কিনা লাগবে?

হ্যাঁ, অডিও কোয়ালিটি, কমফর্ট এবং গোপনীয়তা প্রাধান করলে ব্যবহারকারীদের জন্য, Ray-Ban Meta Audio চশমা 12 ঘণ্টা battery life এবং একটি গোপনীয়, নর্দার চশমার ডিজাইন দিয়ে মজবুত প্রদर्शन প্রদান করে।

বাংলা version →


🇩🇪 Deutsch

Ray-Ban Meta Audio Brillen-Test: Keine Kamera, toller Klang

Alltags aussehende Brillen, solider Sound und viel längere Akkulaufzeit – ein Gewinn für jeden.Karissa Bell für Engadget Bewertung: 8.5 / 10

Vorteile: Leicht und bequem. Rahmenstile sehen mehr wie "normale Brillen" aus. Massiv verbesserte Akkulaufzeit

Nachteile: Aktionsknopf ist nicht besonders nützlich. Privatsphärebedenken sind nach wie vor präsent. In einer Zeit, in der es wachsenden Widerstand gegen die wachsende Produktlinie der firmeneigenen Kamerabrillen gibt, verzichten die Ray-Ban Meta Audio Brillen auf die Funktion, die am häufigsten mit "Spionagebrillen" assoziiert wird. Wie der Name schon sagt, stehen diese Brillen ganz im Zeichen des Audios. Das Ergebnis ist ein Paar Brillen, die leichter, bequemer und eine viel längere Akkulaufzeit haben als jede andere Brille des Unternehmens. Sie sehen auch dezenter aus und sind den "normalen Brillen", die wir von Meta je gesehen haben, am nächsten.

Neues Design, bessere PassformMeta bietet für seine 349 Dollar teuren Audio-only-Brillen zwei verschiedene Rahmenstile an: Burbank, die etwas dünner wie ein Wayfarer aussieht, und Clubmaster, einen sofort wiedererkennbaren Ray-Ban-Design. Ich habe mich für Letzteres entschieden, weil es mehr Farbvarianten gibt und ich im Allgemeinen dünnere Rahmen bevorzuge. Von vorne gesehen, weiß ich nicht, ob jemand die Brillen als technisch begabt erkennen würde. Meine Brillen hatten die transparenten Bügel, die Meta oft verwendet, um die interne Schaltung der Brillen zu zeigen, aber es ist immer noch relativ dezent.Karissa Bell für Engadget

Die rechte Bügel hat weiterhin ein Touchpad zum Steuern der Lautstärke, Annehmen von Anrufen und andere Funktionen, sowie eine kleine nach innen gerichtete LED für Benachrichtigungen. Es gibt zudem einen kleinen Aktionsknopf, der als dedizierten Shortcut für bestimmte Funktionen verwendet werden kann. Es scheint, als hätte Meta einfach ihre bestehenden Brillen-Designs straffen, aber Wearables-VP Ming Hua mir gesagt, dass die Firma tatsächlich den Speaker- und Mikrofonaufbau für kleinere Rahmen neu konzipieren musste. Diese Arbeit hat sich definitiv gelohnt. Die Audio-only Brillen sind anderen Modellen nachweislich schlanker. Sie sitzen zudem besser und sind bequemer, da weniger Gewicht vorne am Rahmen lastet. Bei 47 Gramm sind die Clubmaster-Brillen nur 2 Gramm leichter als die Ray-Ban Meta Optics-Brillen, aber sie fühlen sich leichter an, weil sie weniger Druck um die Nase ausüben.Karissa Bell für Engadget

Wenn Sie meine vorherigen Rezensionen von Meta-Brillen gelesen haben, wissen Sie, dass ich oft Schwierigkeiten habe, einen guten Sitz zu bekommen. Die meisten Rahmenstile scheinen für Gesichter nur wenig breiter als meinem eigenen konzipiert zu sein, und das Gewicht neigt dazu, die Brillen zum Rutschen zu bringen. Die Ray-Ban Meta Audio Brillen haben jedoch traditionelle Nasenpads, die tatsächlich sitzen bleiben. Auch die Nasenbügel können von einem Optiker justiert werden (Meta bietet diesen Service auch in seinen Filialen und Pop-ups an), aber diese Brillen sitzen mir von Anfang an gut, ohne jede Justierung. Ich sie mehrere lange Phasen getragen und habe tatsächlich vergessen, dass ich smarte Brillen trage, weil sie sich so sehr wie meine gewöhnlichen Sonnenbrillen angefühlt haben.

Keine Kamera (fast) IAWie andere aktuelle Brillen von Meta haben auch die Audio-only Brillen 6 Mikrofone und Open-Ear-Lautsprecher. Musik, Podcasts und Anrufe klangen genauso gut wie meine Gen 2 Brillen. Eine Besonderheit der Audio-only Brillen ist, dass die Mikrofone leicht andere Positionen haben. Jetzt gibt es zwei Mikrofone an der Vorderseite der Brillen, die die ersetzen, die früher in den Nasenpads verbaut waren. Die anderen vier sitzen an den Bügeln. Diese neue Platzierung schien die Dinge nicht zu beeinflussen, allerdings. Freunde und Familie sagten mir, ich klinge bei Anrufen, wenn ich die Audio-Brillen trage, klarer als mit meinen zweiten Air Pods Pro. Der andere große Vorteil der Audio-only Brillen im Vergleich zu anderen Modellen ist die Akkulaufzeit. Meta sagt, die Brillen können bei "gemischter Nutzung" 12 Stunden durchhalten und bis zu sechs Stunden durchgehende Audiowiedergabe...

Sind die Ray-Ban Meta Audio Brillen den Kauf wert?

Ja, für Nutzer, die Audioqualität, Komfort und Privatsphäre gegenüber Kameras priorisieren, bieten die Ray-Ban Meta Audio Brillen starke Performance mit 12 Stunden Akkulaufzeit und einem dezenten Design, das normalen Brillen ähnelt.

Deutsch version →


🇪🇸 Español

Ray-Ban Meta Audio Gafas Revisión: Sin Cámara, Gran Sonido

Gafas con apariencia normal, sonido sólido y mucha más vida útil de batería, es una victoria para todos. Karissa Bell para Engadget CALIFICACIÓN: 8.5 / 10

Pros: Livianos y cómodos. Los estilos de marco se ven más como "gafas normales". Autonomía de batería mejorada enormemente.

Contras: El botón de acción no es tan útil. Las preocupaciones de privacidad siguen siendo un tema. En un momento en que hay creciente rechazo a la creciente línea de gafas con cámara de la compañía, las gafas Ray-Ban Meta Audio descartan la característica más asociada con "gafas espiadoras". Como su nombre lo indica, los marcos se trata todo sobre aprovechar al máximo el audio. El resultado es un par de gafas que son más livianas, más cómodas y tienen mucha más vida útil de batería que cualquier otra gafas de la compañía. También se ven mucho más sutiles y son las más cercanas a "gafas normales" que hemos visto de Meta.

Nuevo estilo, mejor ajuste

Meta tiene dos estilos de marco diferentes para sus gafas de solo audio de 349 dólares: Burbank, que se parece un poco a un Wayfarer más delgado, y Clubmaster, un diseño de Ray-Ban inmediatamente reconocible. Opté por el segundo porque viene en una mayor variedad de colores y prefiero los marcos más delgados en general. Desde el frente, no estoy seguro de que alguien reconocería las gafas como teniendo alguna habilidad tecnológica. Mis marcos sí tienen los brazos transparentes que Meta a menudo usa para mostrar la circuito interno de las gafas, pero sigue siendo relativamente sutil.Karissa Bell para Engadget

No hay cámara ni LED frontal, pero la configuración en general es similar a los otros gafas de Meta. El brazo derecho aún tiene un panel táctil para controlar el volumen, contestar llamadas y otras funciones, y hay un pequeño LED interno orientado hacia adentro para notificaciones. También hay un pequeño botón de acción, que puedes usar como acceso directo dedicado a ciertas funciones. Parece que Meta simplemente simplificó sus diseños de gafas existentes, pero el vicepresidente de Wearables de la empresa, Ming Hua, me dijo que la compañía realmente tuvo que reconstruir el conjunto de altavoces y micrófonos para que funcionaran en un marco más pequeño. Ese trabajo definitivamente valió la pena. Las gafas de solo audio son notablemente más delgadas que otros modelos. También se ajustan mejor y son mucho más cómodas porque menos peso recae sobre la parte frontal de los marcos. A 47 gramos, las gafas Clubmaster solo son 2 gramos más ligeras que las gafas Ray-Ban Meta Optics, pero se sienten mucho más ligeras porque ejercen menos presión alrededor de mi nariz.Karissa Bell para Engadget

Si has leído mis revisiones anteriores de otras gafas de marca Meta, sabes que a menudo tengo problemas para obtener un buen ajuste. La mayoría de los estilos de marco parecen estar destinados a caras solo un poco más anchas que la mía, y el peso tiende a hacer que se deslicen por mi cara. Pero las gafas Ray-Ban Meta Audio de hecho tienen nasopartes tradicionales que se mantienen en su lugar. También puedes hacer ajustar las puntas por un óptico (Meta también brinda este servicio en sus tiendas minoristas y pop-ups también), pero estas realmente me quedan bien desde la caja sin ningún ajuste. Las usé durante varios periodos largos y de hecho olvidé que estaba usando gafas inteligentes porque se sentían tan mucho como mis lentes típicos.

Sin cámara, (mayormente) la misma IA

Al igual que otros gafas recientes de Meta, los marcos de solo audio tienen 6 micrófonos y altavoces de oreja abierta. Música, podcasts y llamadas telefónicas sonaron tan bien como mis gafas Gen 2. Un capricho de las gafas de solo audio es que los micrófonos están en ligeramente diferentes lugares. Ahora hay dos micrófonos en la parte frontal de los marcos, reemplazando a los que estaban incrustados en las nasopartes en modelos anteriores. Los otros cuatro están en los brazos. Este nuevo posicionamiento no pareció afectar las cosas, aunque. Amigos y familiares me dijeron que sonaba más claro mis llamadas cuando usaba las gafas de audio, en comparación con mis segundos Air Pods Pro. La otra gran ventaja que tienen las gafas de solo audio en comparación con otros modelos es la vida útil de la batería. Meta dice que los marcos pueden durar 12 horas con "uso mixto" y hasta seis horas de reproducción de audio continua...

¿Las gafas Ray-Ban Meta Audio valen la pena comprar?

Sí, para usuarios que priorizan la calidad de audio, comodidad y privacidad sobre las funciones de cámara, las gafas Ray-Ban Meta Audio ofrecen un rendimiento sólido con 12 horas de batería vida y un diseño discreto que se parece a gafas normales.

Español version →


🇫🇷 Français

Test Ray-Ban Meta Audio : Pas de caméra, excellente qualité sonore

Des lunettes au look classique, un son de qualité et une autonomie bien supérieure, c'est une victoire pour tous.Karissa Bell pour Engadget NOTE : 8.5 / 10

Avantages : Légers et confortables. Les styles de monture ressemblent davantage à "des lunettes classiques". Autonomie de batterie considérablement améliorée

Inconvénients : Le bouton d'action n'est pas très utile. Les préoccupations de vie privée restent tout de même de mise. À un moment où il y a une résistance croissante contre la gamme croissante de lunettes à caméra de l'entreprise, les lunettes Ray-Ban Meta Audio abandonnent la caractéristique la plus associée aux "lunettes espions". Comme leur nom l'indique, les montures sont avant tout destinées à tirer le meilleur parti du son. Le résultat est une paire de lunettes plus légères, plus confortables et bénéficiant d'une autonomie bien supérieure à celle de n'importe quel autre modèle de la marque. Elles apparaissent également plus discrètes et sont les plus proches des "lunettes classiques" que nous ayons vues de Meta.

Nouvelle monture, meilleur ajustement

Meta propose deux styles de monture pour ses lunettes audio-only à 349 $ : Burbank, qui ressemble un peu à un Wayfarer plus fin, et Clubmaster, un design Ray-Ban immédiatement reconnaissable. J'ai opté pour le second car il propose une plus large variété de couleurs et je préfère généralement les montures plus fines. De face, je ne suis pas sûr que quelqu'un reconnaîtrait les lunettes comme ayant des capacités technologiques. Mes montures comportaient tout de même les bras transparents que Meta utilise souvent pour afficher le circuit interne des lunettes, mais c'est tout de même relativement discret.Karissa Bell pour Engadget

Il n'y a pas de caméra ni de LED frontale, mais dans l'ensemble la configuration est similaire aux autres lunettes de Meta. Le bras droit possède toujours un pavé tactile pour contrôler le volume, répondre aux appels et autres fonctions, et il y a une petite LED orientée vers l'intérieur pour les notifications. Il y a également un petit bouton d'action, que l'on peut utiliser comme raccourci dédié à certaines fonctions. Il semble que Meta ait simplement allégé ses designs de lunettes existants, mais le VP de Wearables, Ming Hua, m'a dit que l'entreprise a en réalité dû reconstruire le système d'enceintes et de microphones pour qu'il fonctionne sur un cadre plus petit. Ce travail en valait vraiment la peine. Les lunettes audio-only sont visiblement plus fines que les autres modèles. Elles s'ajustent également mieux et sont beaucoup plus confortables car moins de poids repose sur le devant des montures. À 47 grammes, les lunettes Clubmaster ne sont que 2 grammes plus légères que les lunettes Ray-Ban Meta Optics, mais elles semblent beaucoup plus légères car elles exercent moins de pression autour de mon nez.Karissa Bell pour Engadget

Si vous avez lu mes revues précédentes de lunettes Meta de marque, vous savez que j'ai souvent du mal à obtenir un bon ajustement. La plupart des styles de monture semblent destinés à des visages juste un peu plus larges que le mien, et le poids tend à les faire glisser sur mon visage. Mais les lunettes Ray-Ban Meta Audio ont en fait des nasards traditionnels qui restent en place. Vous pouvez également faire ajuster les embouts par un opticien (Meta propose également ce service dans ses magasins de détail et ses pop-ups également), mais celles-ci m'ont vraiment bien ajusté dès la boîte sans aucun réglage. Je les ai portées pendant plusieurs longues étendues et j'ai en fait oublié que je portais des lunettes intelligentes car elles se sentaient tellement comme mes lunettes habituelles.

Pas de caméra (presque) IA

Comme les autres lunettes récentes de Meta, les montures audio-only comportent 6 microphones et haut-parleurs open-ear. La musique, les podcasts et les appels sonnaient tout aussi bien que mes lunettes Gen 2. Une particularité des lunettes audio-only est que les microphones sont légèrement placés différemment. Il y a maintenant deux microphones au devant des montures, remplaçant ceux qui étaient intégrés aux nasards des modèles précédents. Les quatre autres sont sur les bras. Cette nouvelle implantation n'a pas semblé affecter les choses, toutefois. Des amis et de la m'ont dit que je sonnais plus clair lors des appels lorsque je portais les lunettes audio, comparé à mes deuxièmes Air Pods Pro. L'autre avantage majeur que possèdent les lunettes audio-only par rapport aux autres modèles est l'autonomie de batterie. Meta affirme que les montures peuvent durer 12 heures avec "utilisation mixte" et jusqu'à six heures d'écoute audio continue...

Les lunettes Ray-Ban Meta Audio en valent-elles l'achat ?

Oui, pour les utilisateurs privilégiant la qualité sonore, le confort et la vie privée par rapport aux fonctionnalités de caméra, les lunettes Ray-Ban Meta Audio offrent de bonnes performances avec 12 heures d'autonomie et un design discret ressemblant à des lunettes classiques.

Français version →


🇮🇳 हिन्दी

Ray-Ban Meta Audio चश्मे की समीक्षा: कोई कैमरा नहीं, बेहतरीन आवाज

सामान्य दिखने वाले चश्मे, ठोस ध्वनि और बहुत बेहतर बैटरी लाइफ, हर किसी के लिए एक जीत।Karissa Bell for Engadget रेटिंग: 8.5 / 10

प्रो: हल्के और आरामदायक। शैली "नॉर्मल चश्मे" की तरह दिखती है। बैटरी लाइफ में जबरदस्त सुधार

कॉन: एक्शन बटन बहुत उपयोगी नहीं है। गोपनीयता के मुद्दे अभी भी हैं। जब कंपनी के कैमरा-enabled चश्मे की बढ़ती लाइन के खिलाफ बढ़ती प्रतिक्रिया का समय है, तो Meta के ऑडियो-only स्मार्ट चश्मे से बेहतर समय नहीं हो सकता। कैमरा सुविधा से जुड़े "स्पाई ग्लासेस" से जुड़ी सबसे अधिक विशेषता को छोड़ते हुए, Ray-Ban Meta Audio चश्मे उस विशेषता को छोड़ देते हैं। जैसा कि नाम से पता चलता है, ये चश्मे ध्वनि का अधिकतम लाभ उठाने के बारे में हैं। परिणामस्वरूप, अन्य किसी भी कंपनी के चश्मे की तुलना में हल्के, अधिक आरामदेह और बहुत लंबी बैटरी लाइफ वाले चश्मे। वे भी बहुत अधिक अस्पष्ट दिखते हैं और Meta से हमने देखे गए "नॉर्मल चश्मे" के सबसे करीब हैं।

नई शैली, बेहतर फिट

Meta अपने 349 डॉलर के केवल ऑडियो चश्मे के लिए दो अलग-अलग फ्रेम शैलियां प्रदान करती है: Burbank, जो एक पतले Wayfarer की तरह दिखता है, और Clubmaster, एक तुरंत पहचाने जाने वाले Ray-Ban डिज़ाइन। मुझे दूसरा पसंद आया क्योंकि यह अधिक रंग विकल्पों में आता है और मुझे आमतौर पर पतले फ्रेम पसंद हैं। सामने से, मुझे यकीन नहीं है कि कोई भी इन चश्मे को तकनीकी क्षमताओं वाला मान लेगा। मेरे फ्रेम में Meta अक्सर आंतरिक सर्किट्री दिखाने के लिए उपयोग करती है transparent arms, लेकिन यह अभी भी अपेक्षाकृत कम महत्वपूर्ण है।Karissa Bell for Engadget

दाएं हाथ की तरफ अभी भी वॉल्यूम कंट्रोल, कॉल्स जवाब देने और अन्य कार्यों के लिए टचपैड है, और अंदर की ओर देखने वाले LED के लिए एक छोटा LED है। इसके अलावा, एक छोटा एक्शन बटन है, जिसे कुछ सुविधाओं के लिए समर्पित शॉर्टकट के रूप में इस्तेमाल किया जा सकता है। ऐसा लग सकता है कि Meta ने बस अपने मौजूदा चश्मे के डिज़ाइन को सरल बनाया है, लेकिन Wearables के VP, Ming Hua, ने मुझे बताया कि कंपनी वास्तव में छोटे फ्रेम पर काम करने के लिए स्पीकर और माइक्रोफोन सेटअप को फिर से बनाना पड़ा था। यह काम निश्चित रूप से रंग लाया। केवल ऑडियो वाले चश्मे, अन्य मॉडल की तुलना में काफी अधिक संकरे हैं। वे बेहतर फिट भी हैं और कम्फर्टेबल भी हैं क्योंकि कम वजन सामने के फ्रेम की ओर बैठता है। 47 ग्राम के वजन वाले Clubmaster चश्मे, Ray-Ban Meta Optics चश्मे से केवल 2 ग्राम हल्के हैं, लेकिन वे महसूस बहुत अधिक हल्के हैं क्योंकि वे नाक पर कम दबाव डालते हैं।Karissa Bell for Engadget

अगर आप मेरे अन्य Meta-लेबल वाले चश्मे की past reviews पढ़ चुके हैं, तो आप जानते हैं कि मुझे अक्सर एक अच्छी फिट पाने में कठिनाई होती है। अधिकांश फ्रेम शैलियां बस मेरे चेहरे के लिए थोड़ी広 wider लगती हैं, और वजन की वजह से वे मेरे चेहरे पर फिसलने की प्रवृत्ति रखते हैं। लेकिन Ray-Ban Meta Audio चश्मे वास्तव में traditional notepads के साथ आते हैं जो वास्तव में जगह पर बने रहते हैं। आप optician द्वारा tips भी प्राप्त कर सकते हैं (Meta भी अपने खुदरा स्टोर और pop-ups पर यह सेवा प्रदान करता है), लेकिन ये वास्तव में मुझे बॉक्स से बाहर निकालने के बाद अच्छी तरह से फिट होते हैं बिना किसी tweaks के। मैं कई लंबे अंतराल के लिए इन्हें पहनता हूं और वास्तव में भूल जाता हूं कि मैं स्मार्ट चश्मे पहन रहा हूं क्योंकि वे मेरे typical shades की तरह महसूस करते हैं।

नहीं कैमरा (बहुत हद तक) AI

अन्य recent Meta के चश्मे की तरह, केवल ऑडियो फ्रेम में 6 माइक्रोफोन और open-ear speakers होते हैं। संगीत, podcasts और phone calls की आवाज मेरी Gen 2 चश्मे की तरह ही अच्छी लगती है। केवल ऑडियो चश्मे का एक quirk यह है कि माइक्रोफोन slightly different जगहों पर होते हैं। अब फ्रेम के सामने दो माइक्रोफोन होते हैं, जो previous models में embedded nasopads में माइक्रोफोन को बदल देते हैं। अन्य चार arm पर होते हैं। यह नया placement चीजों को प्रभावित नहीं लगता, हालांकि। दोस्तों और परिवार ने मुझे बताया कि जब मैं Audio glasses पहनता हूं तो मुझे second-gen Air Pods Pro की तुलना में कॉल पर मुझे clearer सुना गया। केवल ऑडियो चश्मे अन्य मॉडल के मुकाबले सबसे बड़ी advantage बैटरी लाइफ है। Meta का दावा है कि फ्रेम mixed use के साथ 12 घंटे तक चल सकते हैं और लगातार ऑडियो प्लेबैक के लिए छह घंटे तक...

Ray-Ban Meta Audio चश्मे खरीदने लायक हैं?

हां, उन उपयोगकर्ताओं के लिए जो कैमरा सुविधाओं के ऊपर ऑडियो गुणवत्ता, आराम और गोपनीयता को प्राथमिकता देते हैं, Ray-Ban Meta Audio चश्मे मजबूत प्रदर्शन के साथ 12-घंटे की बैटरी लाइफ और एक अस्पष्ट, सामान्य चश्मे डिज़ाइन प्रदान करते हैं।

हिन्दी version →


🇮🇩 Bahasa Indonesia

Review Ray-Ban Meta Audio: Tidak Ada Kamera, Suara Bagus

Kacamata tampil umum, suara padat dan banyak lebih lama baterinya, menang untuk semua.Karissa Bell for Engadget Rating: 8.5 / 10

Pro: Ringan dan nyaman. Gaya kerangka terlihat lebih seperti "kacamata biasa". Peningkatan umur baterai yang sangat signifikan

Con: Tombol aksi tidak terlalu berguna. Masalah privasi masih ada. Saat ini semakin banyak balikbalik terhadap produk kami yang semakin banyak fitur kamera, kacamata Ray-Ban Meta Audio melepaskan fitur yang paling dikenal sebagai "kacamata penyangga". Seperti namanya, kerangka ini sepenuhnya tentang memanfaatkan audio. Hasilnya kacamata yang lebih ringan, lebih nyaman dan memiliki umur baterai yang jauh lebih lama daripada kacamata perusahaan mana pun. Mereka juga terlihat lebih disingkat dan adalah kacamata "biasa" yang paling kita lihat dari Meta.

Gaya baru, pas yang lebih baikMeta memiliki dua gaya kerangka yang berbeda untuk kacamata audio-onlynya yang harganya 349 dolar: Burbank, yang sedikit seperti Wayfarer yang lebih tipis, dan Clubmaster, desain Ray-Ban yang langsung dikenali. Saya memilih yang kedua karena memiliki varian warna yang lebih luas dan saya lebih suka kerangka yang lebih tipis secara umum. Dari depan, saya tidak yakin siapa pun akan mengakui kacamata ini memiliki kemampuan teknologi. Kerangka saya memang memiliki lengan transparan yang Meta sering gunakan untuk menampilkan sirkuit internal kacamata, tetapi masih relatif tipis.Karissa Bell for Engadget

Tangan kanan masih memiliki touchpad untuk mengontrol volume, menjawab panggilan dan fungsi lain, serta LED kecil menghadap dalam untuk notifikasi. Ada juga tombol aksi kecil, yang dapat digunakan sebagai pintasan khusus untuk fitur tertentu. Sepertinya Meta hanya meringkas desain kerangka yang sudah ada, tetapi VP Wearables Ming Hua bilang padaku perusahaan sebenarnya harus merekonstruksi setup speaker dan mikrofon untuk bekerja pada kerangka yang lebih kecil. Pekerjaan ini pasti menguntungkan. Kacamata audio-only terlihat lebih tipis daripada model lain. Mereka juga lebih nyaman dan pas lebih baik karena lebih sedikit berat yang duduk di depan kerangka. Berat 47 gram, kerangka Clubmaster hanya 2 gram lebih ringan daripada kerangka Ray-Ban Meta Optics, tetapi merasa lebih ringan karena menekan lebih sedikit di hidung.Karissa Bell for Engadget

Jika Anda membaca review saya tentang kacamata Meta merekat lain, Anda tahu saya sering kesulitan mendapatkan pas yang bagus. Mayoritas gaya kerangka sepertinya dibuat untuk wajah sedikit lebih lebar dari milik saya, dan berat cenderung membuat kacamata tergelincir di wajah saya. Tapi kacamata Ray-Ban Meta Audio sebenarnya memiliki notepad tradisional yang benar-benar tetap di tempat. Anda juga bisa mendapatkan ujungnya disesuaikan oleh optik (Meta juga menawarkan layanan ini di toko ritel dan pop-up-nya juga), tetapi kacamata ini sebenarnya pas dari kotak tanpa modifikasi apa pun. Saya memakainya selama beberapa waktu yang panjang dan sebenarnya lupa memakainya kacamata pintar karena terasa seperti kacamata biasa saya.

Tidak ada kamera (hampir) AISeperti kacamata Meta terbaru lainnya, kacamata audio-only memiliki 6 mikrofon dan speaker open-ear. Musik, podcast dan panggilan suara sebaik seperti kacamata Gen 2 saya. Sifat unik kacamata audio-only adalah mikrofonnya sedikit berbeda letak. Sekarang ada dua mikrofon di depan kerangka, mengganti mikrofon yang sebelumnya ditanamkan di nospad model sebelumnya. Empat lainnya ada di lengan. Penempatan baru ini sepertinya tidak mempengaruhi hal-hal, meski begitu. Teman dan keluarga member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member member

Bahasa Indonesia version →


🇯🇵 日本語

Ray-Ban Meta Audio グラスレビュー:カメラなし、音質優秀

見た目普通のグラス、音質が良く、バッテリー持ちが大幅に向上、万人にとっての勝利。Karissa Bell for Engadget レーティング: 8.5 / 10

長所:軽量で快適 「普通のグラス」に見えるスタイル 大幅に改善されたバッテリー寿命

短所:アクションボタンはそれほど便利ではない プライバシーへの懸念はまだある 会社のカメラ搭載グラスに対する反発が高まる中、Metaのオーディオ専用グラスはこれ以上ないタイミングで登場。カメラ機能が「のぞき眼鏡」と最も関連付けられている中、Ray-Ban Meta Audioグラスは最も関連する機能を捨てました。名前の通り、これらグラスはオーディオを最大限に活用することに注力しています。その結果、他社のグラスより軽量で快適で、バッテリー寿命も大幅に向上。さらに控えめで、これまでMetaが作ってきた「普通のグラス」に最も近いデザインです。

新しいスタイル、よりフィット感の良いものMetaはオーディオ専用グラス349ドル用に2種類のフレームスタイルを提供しています:Burbank、Wayfarerの薄型に似ており、Clubmaster、すぐに認識できるRay-Banデザイン。後者を選びました。色のバリエーションが豊富で、一般的に細いフレームが好みだからです。正面から見ると、誰がこれらグラスにテクノロジー機能があるとは気づかないかもしれません。私のフレームはMetaがよく使う透明なアームを採用しており、グラス内部の回路を表示していますが、それでも比較的控えめです。Karissa Bell for Engadget

右アームには依然として音量調整、通話応答その他の機能用のタッチパッドと、通知用の小さな内向きLEDが搭載されています。また、特定の機能用の専用ショートカットとして使用できる小さなアクションボタンもあります。Metaが単に既存のグラスデザインを簡略化したように見えますが、Wearables VPのMing Huaによると、会社は実際にはより小さなフレームで動作するようにスピーカーとマイクのセットアップを再構築する必要があったそうです。この作業は間違いなく報われました。オーディオ専用グラスは他のモデルより明らかにスリムです。さらにフィット感が良く、快適です。重量が前面のフレームにかかる圧力が少ないからです。47グラムのClubmasterグラスは、Ray-Ban Meta Opticsグラスより2グラム軽いですが、前面のフレームにかかる圧力が少ないため、はるかに軽く感じられます。Karissa Bell for Engadget

過去のMetaブランドのグラスレビューを読んだことがある方は、私よくフィット感で苦労していることをご存知でしょう。ほとんどのフレームスタイルは私の顔より少し広い顔向けに作られており、重量のため顔に滑りやすくなっています。しかしRay-Ban Meta Audioグラスは実際には伝統的なノーズパッドを備えており、しっかりと固定されます。 optician にノーズパッドの調整も可能です(Metaも小売店とポップアップでこのサービスを提供していますが)、これらは箱から出してすぐフィットします。調整なしで数時間かけて実際に着用してみると、スマートグラスを着けていることを忘れていました。なぜなら、普段のサングラスのように感じるからです。

カメラなし(ほぼ)AI他のMetaの最近のグラス同様、オーディオ専用グラスは6つのマイクとオープンイヤースピーカーを搭載しています。音楽、ポッドキャスト、電話通話の音質は私のGen 2グラスと同じくらい良いです。オーディオ専用グラスのクirkは、マイクの位置が少し違うことです。 now フレームの前に2つのマイクがあり、以前のモデルに組み込まれていたノーズパッドのマイクを置き換えています。他の4つはアームにあります。この新しい配置は apparently 効果なかったようです。友人や家族に言わせると、Air Pods Proの第2世代を使用しているときよりも、オーディオグラスを着けていたときの方が通話の声がクリアに聞こえたそうです。オーディオ専用グラスが他のモデルと比較して最大の利点はバッテリー寿命です。Metaは「混合使用」で12時間、連続オーディオ再生では最大6時間持つと言っています...

Ray-Ban Meta Audio グラスは購入する価値がありますか?

はい、オーディオ品質、快適性、カメラ機能よりも優先するユーザーにとって、Ray-Ban Meta Audio グラスは12時間のバッテリー寿命と控えめで普通のグラスのようなデザインを備えた優れたパフォーマンスを提供します。

日本語 version →


🇧🇷 Português

Review Ray-Ban Meta Audio: Sem Câmera, Som Excelente

Óculos com aparência comum, som sólido e muito mais vida útil de bateria, é uma vitória para todos.Karissa Bell para Engadget AVALIAÇÃO: 8.5 / 10

Prós: Leves e confortáveis. Estilos de arma mais como "óculos normais". Autonomia de bateria melhorada consideravelmente

Contras: Botão de ação não é tão útil. Preocupações com privacidade ainda são uma coisa. Em um momento em que há crescente rejeição ao crescente lineup de óculos com câmera da empresa, os óculos Ray-Ban Meta Audio dispensam a característica mais associada a "óculos espiões". Como o nome indica, as armações são tudo sobre aproveitar ao máximo o áudio. O resultado é um par de óculos mais leves, mais confortáveis e com muita mais vida útil de bateria do que qualquer outro óculos da empresa. Eles também parecem muito mais discretos e são os mais próximos de "óculos normais" que já vimos da Meta.

Novo estilo, melhor ajuste

Meta tem dois estilos de arma diferentes para seus óculos audio-only de 349 dólares: Burbank, que parece um pouco um Wayfarer mais fino, e Clubmaster, um design de Ray-Ban imediatamente reconhecível. Optei pelo segundo porque vem em uma variedade maior de cores e prefiro armações mais finas em geral. Da frente, não tenho certeza de que alguém reconheceria os óculos como tendo alguma habilidade tecnológica. Minhas armações tinham os braços transparentes que Meta costuma usar para exibir o circuito interno dos óculos, mas ainda assim é relativamente discreto.Karissa Bell para Engadget

Não há câmera nem LED frontal, mas a configuração geral é similar a outros óculos da Meta. O braço direito ainda tem um touchpad para controlar o volume, atender chamadas e outras funções, e há um pequeno LED interno voltado para dentro para notificações. Também há um pequeno botão de ação, que pode ser usado como atalho dedicado para certas funções. Parece que Meta simplesmente simplificou seus designs de óculos existentes, mas o VP de Wearables, Ming Hua, me disse que a empresa realmente teve que reestruturar o setup de alto-falantes e microfones para funcionar em um arma menor. Esse trabalho definitivamente valeu a pena. Os óculos de áudio-only são notavelmente mais finos que outros modelos. Eles também se ajustam melhor e são muito mais confortáveis porque menos peso fica sobre a frente das armações. Peso 47 gramas, as armações Clubmaster são apenas 2 gramas mais leves que as armações Ray-Ban Meta Optics, mas se sentem muito mais leves porque exercem menos pressão ao redor do meu nariz.Karissa Bell para Engadget

Se você leu minhas revisões anteriores de óculos da marca Meta, sabe que frequentemente tenho dificuldade em obter um bom ajuste. A maioria dos estilos de arma parece destinada a rostos apenas um pouco mais largos que o meu, e o peso tende a fazê-los deslizar pelo meu rosto. Mas os óculos Ray-Ban Meta Audio têm naso pads tradicionais que realmente ficam no lugar. Você também pode fazer ajustar as pontas por um ótico (Meta também oferece este serviço em suas lojas varejistas e pop-ups também), mas esses realmente me serviram bem desde a caixa sem nenhum ajuste. Usei-os durante vários alongamentos longos e na verdade esqueci que estava usando óculos inteligentes porque eles se sentiam tão muito como meus óculos típicos.

Sem câmera (quase) IA

Como outros óculos recentes da Meta, as armações de áudio-only têm 6 microfones e alto-falantes open-ear. Música, podcasts e ligações soaram tão bem quanto meus óculos Gen 2. Uma particularidade dos óculos de áudio-only é que os microfones estão em ligeiramente diferentes lugares. Agora há dois microfones na frente das armações, substituindo os que estavam incorporados nas nasofaces nos modelos anteriores. Os outros quatro estão nos braços. Esse novo posicionamento não parecia afetar as coisas, contudo. Amigos e familiares me disseram que eu soava mais claro em chamadas quando estava usando os óculos de áudio, comparado com meus segundos Air Pods Pro. A outra grande vantagem que os óculos de áudio-only têm em comparação com outros modelos é a autonomia de bateria. Meta diz que as armações podem durar 12 horas com "uso misto" e até seis horas de reprodução de áudio contínua...

As óculos Ray-Ban Meta Audio valem a pena comprar?

Sim, para usuários que priorizam qualidade de áudio, conforto e privacidade em relação a recursos de câmera, os óculos Ray-Ban Meta Audio oferecem um desempenho sólido com 12 horas de vida útil de bateria e um design discreto que parece óculos normais.

Português version →


🇷🇺 Русский

Обзор Ray-Ban Meta Audio: Нет камеры, отличный звук

Очки обычного вида, хороший звук и гораздо больший ресурс батареи — победа для всех.Karissa Bell для Engadget ОЦЕНКА: 8.5 / 10

Плюсы: Легкие и комфортные. Стили оправ более похожи на "обычные очки". Значительно улучшенная автономность батареи

Минусы: Кнопка действия не очень полезна. Проблемы с приватностью всё ещё существуют. В момент, когда растет недовольство растущим линейкой очков с камерой компании, очки Ray-Ban Meta Audio отказываются от функции, самой ассоциируемой с "шпионскими очками". Как следует из названия, оправы в первую очередь посвящены аудио. Результат — пара очков легче, комфортнее и с гораздо большей автономностью батареи, чем любые другие очки компании. Они также выглядят более незаметны и самые близкие к "обычным очкам", которые мы видели от Meta.

Новый стиль, лучшее качество ношения

Meta предлагает два стиля оправ для своих очков только с аудио за 349 долларов: Burbank, который немного похож на более тонкий Wayfarer, и Clubmaster, узнаваемый дизайн Ray-Ban. Я выбрал второй, так как он предлагает более широкий выбор цветов, и я в общем предпочитаю более тонкие оправы. С лицевой стороны я не уверен, что кто-то распознает очки как обладающие техническими возможностями. Мои оправы все же имеют прозрачные дужки, которые Meta часто использует для отображения внутренней схемы очков, но это всё же относительно незаметно.Karissa Bell для Engadget

Правый дужок всё ещё имеет тачпад для управления громкостью, ответа на вызовы и других функций, а также маленький внутренний LED для уведомлений. Также есть маленькая кнопка действия, которую можно использовать как выделенный ярлык для определенных функций. Кажется, что Meta просто упростила свои существующие дизайны очков, но VP по носкеables, Ming Hua, сказал мне, что компании на самом деле пришлось перепроектировать динамик и микрофонную установку, чтобы они работали в более маленьком кадре. Эта работа точно оправдала себя. Очки только с аудио заметно тоньше других моделей. Они также лучше сидят и комфортнее, так как меньше веса прижимается к передней части оправ. Вес 47 грамм, оправы Clubmaster на 2 грамма легче, чем оправы Ray-Ban Meta Optics, но они ощущаются легче, так как давление вокруг носа меньше.Karissa Bell для Engadget

Если вы читали мои предыдущие обзоры очков бренда Meta, то знаете, что часто у меня возникает трудность с хорошим сидением. Большинство стилей оправ кажутся предназначенными для лиц чуть шире моего, и вес склонен заставлять очки скользить по лицу. Но очки Ray-Ban Meta Audio на самом деле имеют традиционные ноз pads, которые на месте. Также можно отрегулировать наконечники у оптике (Meta также предоставляет эту услугу в своих розничных магазинах и поп-ап магазинах), но эти оправы на самом деле идеально сидят с коробки, без каких-либо корректировок. Я носил их в течение нескольких длинных интервалов и на самом деле забыл, что ношу умные очки, потому что они чувствовали так же, как мои обычные очки.

Без камеры (почти) IA

Как и другие последние очки от Meta, оправы только с аудио имеют 6 микрофонов и динамики open-ear. Музыка, подкасты и звонки звучали так же хорошо, как мои очки Gen 2. Одной из особенностей очков только с аудио является то, что микрофоны находятся в немного других местах. Теперь есть два микрофона на передней части оправ, заменяющие те, что были вставлены в нозовые перчатки в предыдущих моделях. Остальные четыре на дужках. Это новое расположение, казалось, не повлияло на вещи, однако. Друзья и семья говорили, что я звучал четче в звонках, когда носил очки с аудио, по сравнению со своими вторыми Air Pods Pro. Другая главная преимущество очков только с аудио по сравнению с другими моделями — это автономность батареи. Meta говорит, что оправы могут работать 12 часов с "смешанным использованием" и до шести часов непрерывного аудиовозведения...

Ценны ли очки Ray-Ban Meta Audio?

Да, для пользователей, приоритизирующих качество звука, комфорт и приватность над функциями камеры, очки Ray-Ban Meta Audio предлагают сильное производительность с 12-часовой автономностью батареи и незаметный дизайн, похожий на обычные очки.

Русский version →


🇨🇳 简体中文

Ray-Ban Meta Audio眼镜评测:无相机,音质极佳

外观时尚的眼镜,音质出色,续航时间远超同类产品,是所有人的最佳选择。Karissa Bell for Engadget 评分:8.5 / 10

优点:轻便舒适 造型更像"普通"眼镜 电池续航大幅提升

缺点:操作按钮实用性有限 隐私问题依然存在 随着公司产品线中相机功能越来越多,Meta的音频智能眼镜再合适不过。在人们对公司相机功能眼镜日益反感的背景下,Ray-Ban Meta Audio系列放弃了最让人感到"窥探眼镜"的功能。正如名称所暗示的,这些眼镜的重点在于最大限度地发挥音频性能。结果是一副比公司任何其他眼镜都轻便、更舒适,且续航时间更长的眼镜。它们看起来也更隐蔽,是我们见过的最接近"普通"眼镜的Meta产品。

新款式,更贴合佩戴感

Meta为其349美元的仅音频眼镜提供两种不同的框架款式:Burbank,外观类似更薄的Wayfarer;Clubmaster, instantly可辨认的Ray-Ban设计。我选择了后者,因为它有更广泛的颜色选择,而且我总体上更喜欢更细的框架。从正面看,我不确定任何人会认出这些眼镜有任何科技功能。我的款式确实使用了Meta经常使用的透明臂来展示眼镜内部的电路,但这仍然相对低调。Karissa Bell for Engadget

右臂上仍然有用于控制音量、接听电话和其他功能的触控板,以及用于通知的微型内向LED。此外,还有一个微型操作按钮,可用作某些功能的专用快捷键。看起来Meta只是简化了现有的眼镜设计,但公司可穿戴产品负责人Ming Hua告诉我,公司实际上不得不重新设计扬声器和麦克风设置,以便在更小的框架上使用。这项工作绝对值得。仅音频眼镜比其他型号明显更纤薄。它们的佩戴感也更好,更舒适,因为更少的重量压在框架的前面。重量仅47克,Clubmaster款式比Ray-Ban Meta Optics款式轻2克,但它们感觉更轻,是因为它们对鼻子的压力更小。Karissa Bell for Engadget

如果你阅读过我以往对其他Meta品牌眼镜的评测,你就知道我经常在获得良好佩戴感方面遇到困难。大多数框架款式似乎是为比我自己的头稍宽的脸设计的,而且重量倾向于导致它们在我的脸上滑落。但Ray-Ban Meta Audio眼镜实际上配有传统的鼻托,可以固定不动。你也可以让镜腿由验光师调整(Meta也在其零售店和快闪店提供这项服务),但这些眼镜实际上在我穿上之后就很贴合,不需要任何调整。我佩戴了好几个长时间段,实际上因为它们感觉像我的典型太阳镜而忘记我佩戴了智能眼镜。

无相机(大部分)AI

与Meta的其他最近款式类似,仅音频框架配有6个麦克风和开放式扬声器。音乐、播客和电话通话的声音质量与我的Gen 2眼镜一样好。仅音频眼镜的一个小众特点是,麦克风的位置略有不同。帧前现在有两个麦克风,取代了之前型号中嵌入鼻托的麦克风。其余四个位于臂上。这种新布置似乎并未影响性能。不过,朋友和家人告诉我,当我佩戴音频眼镜时,我通话的声音比佩戴第二代Air Pods Pro时更清晰。仅音频眼镜相较于其他型号的另一个主要优势是电池续航。Meta声称,在"混合使用"情况下,该框架单次充电可续航12小时,最长连续音频播放时间达六小时……

Ray-Ban Meta Audio眼镜值得购买吗?

是的,对于优先考虑音质、舒适度和隐私而非相机功能的用户,Ray-Ban Meta Audio眼镜提供了出色的性能,续航12小时,外观隐蔽,外观像普通眼镜。

简体中文 version →