HeadlinesBriefing favicon HeadlinesBriefing.com

Trump's Iran War: Why NATO Allies Must Act Now

New York Times Top Stories •
×

Bret Stephens argues that despite widespread opposition to President Trump's military action in Iran, NATO allies cannot afford to remain passive observers. The columnist contends that the war's outcome directly impacts European security, particularly given Tehran's missile capabilities that could soon threaten European capitals. Germany's defense minister Boris Pistorius recently declared 'This is not our war,' a stance Stephens calls dangerously naive.

Stephens warns that a premature withdrawal without securing the Strait of Hormuz would embolden Iran and betray Gulf allies who have already suffered Iranian attacks. He notes that the UAE, after attempting to distance itself from the conflict, has been hit by at least 433 ballistic missiles, 19 cruise missiles and 1,977 drones. The columnist suggests a more effective strategy would involve seizing Iranian oil tankers rather than risking ground operations.

Drawing on David Boies' Wall Street Journal commentary, Stephens emphasizes that inaction now will only create graver threats for future administrations. The columnist concludes that whether Americans support Trump or not, they must recognize that Iran's regional ambitions and missile program pose direct threats to Western security. As Trotsky reportedly observed, 'You may not be interested in war, but war is interested in you.'