California’s gubernatorial race has stunned Democrats who now wonder if former Vice President Kamala Harris should have entered instead of eyeing a third presidential bid. With eight candidates on the ballot, only four break double‑digit polling, leaving the state’s liberal base anxious about a possible Democratic loss in November for the upcoming election.

High‑profile Democrats such as Xavier Becerra, Katie Porter, Tom Steyer, and former Los Angeles mayor Antonio Villaraigosa line up against Republicans Chad Bianco and Steve Hilton. A former cabinet member, Becerra, carries the weight of the Biden administration, while Steyer’s billionaire status draws scrutiny over campaign finance concerns for the state’s political future and investment.

Critics argue Harris’s absence leaves the field fragmented, forcing voters to choose from a crowded slate that may dilute Democratic momentum. Analysts say a Harris entry could have consolidated support, potentially securing double‑digit leads and easing fundraising for statewide campaigns, thereby boosting the party’s national profile in a pivotal swing state for 2028 presidential campaign.

Without Harris, campaign finance groups warn that California’s 2026 election could see a rise in outside spending as candidates scramble for visibility. The state’s mail‑in voting starting June 2 adds pressure on parties to mobilize early, making the gubernatorial outcome a bellwether for future Democratic strategy across the nation in 2028 and beyond for investors.