Gianni Infantino hailed the 2026 World Cup as humanity’s greatest spectacle, touting the U.S., Mexico and Canada edition as the most inclusive ever. Yet critics label it the most politicised, expensive and environmentally taxing tournament. With 48 teams, 104 matches and the historic use of three host nations, the event already faces scrutiny beyond the pitch.

FIFA stands to earn a record $9bn from broadcasting and sponsorship, redistributing $2.7bn to national associations. Ticket pricing sparked outrage when the most expensive seat reached $8,680, far above the $1,550 cap promised in 2018. Fans confronted dynamic pricing, 30% resale fees and inflated transport costs, prompting investigations in New York and New Jersey.

Geopolitical tension roiled the tournament when the Iranian squad shifted from Arizona to Tijuana after U.S.-Israel strikes on Iran, prompting Trump’s envoy to suggest replacement by Italy. Security worries linger amid cartel violence and extreme heat at 14 venues, while a brief ban on reusable bottles raised health alarms. The World Cup now proceeds amid mounting controversy.

Local fans expressed frustration as train fares to MetLife Stadium surged from $12.90 to $150 before settling at $98, and cheap tickets for smaller nations remain scarce. Hospitality data shows hotel bookings lagging expectations across host cities, suggesting the steep costs may dampen attendance. The tournament’s financial windfall therefore risks alienating its core supporters.