Open-source maintainers have adopted a formal protocol for rejecting low-effort AI-generated pull requests, treating them as spam rather than legitimate contributions. The specification outlines diagnostic criteria for identifying machine-generated submissions, including hallucinated APIs, bloated boilerplate, and the telltale use of phrases like "delve" in pull request descriptions. Project maintainers can now apply standardized rejection procedures.

This development follows growing frustration with contributors using large language models to flood repositories with unverified code. The protocol emphasizes that automated submissions waste finite human review time and violate community standards. Contributors found submitting AI-generated content face account restrictions, including degraded permissions and humorous punitive measures like forced Comic Sans fonts.

The specification serves as both a technical standard and a cultural statement about maintaining quality in open-source development. It explicitly rejects the notion that AI-generated content deserves the same consideration as human-written code, regardless of superficial correctness. The document's satirical tone masks a serious concern: GitHub repositories are becoming dumping grounds for LLM outputs designed to game contribution metrics rather than solve actual problems.