Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy Jr. fired two members of the Preventive Services Task Force on May 11, sending letters that cited “administrative” reasons unrelated to performance. The dismissed physicians—Tufts professor John Wong and University of Maryland’s Esa Davis—had been influential on screening guidelines. Their ouster sparked backlash from the medical community, which says the move lacks justification. The administration claims the step safeguards the panel’s longevity.

Jan Carney, president of the American College of Physicians, called the moves “alarmed,” condemning the lack of transparency in Kennedy’s review. He warned the task force, idle for a year, is essential for preventive‑care guidance and should not become a political pawn. Several senators have scheduled hearings to examine whether political pressure is compromising evidence‑based recommendations.

The abrupt terminations risk undermining confidence in future screening recommendations, potentially delaying mammograms and other cancer checks for millions. Lawmakers and professional societies are already drafting letters demanding an independent review of the task force’s composition. Advocacy groups warn any delay in USPSTF endorsements could translate into cancer mortality rates, pressuring insurers to reconsider coverage. Until those safeguards are restored, the USPSTF’s credibility remains compromised.