Time for some DIY LDI
🇬🇧 English
For the first half of my career, UK equity valuations closely tracked the yields on the type of gilts where returns are linked to inflation. The 2000–03 bear market broke that neat relationship, but it is making a comeback. As a green young strategist in the early 1990s, I asked my boss how to value the UK stock market. His gruff reply: “It’s simple, equities trade on the same yield as linkers.” That rule of thumb worked for many years. If real yields rose, as in 1994, then equities derated. If real yields fell, as in the late 1990s, they re-rated.
There is a simple logic behind this. Both assets offer an inflation hedge, albeit of different quality. Index-linked gilts adjust principal and coupons in line with the Retail Prices Index. Equities pay dividends that should, theoretically, rise in line with nominal corporate revenues. However, during the early 2000s bear market, the relationship broke. Index-linked prices rose relentlessly, driving the benchmark real yield below zero in 2012 and down to almost minus 3 per cent in 2021. Meanwhile, equity dividend yields drifted higher, including spikes as shares fell during the 2007–09 financial crisis and 2020 Covid pandemic panic. Having matched index-linked yields for the 1980s and 1990s, equities paid a yield premium of 3.3 percentage points on average between 2001 and 2021.
To explain this profound change, I could use technical terms such as equity risk premia, terminal growth, natural rates and the like. But let’s keep it simple. It was about buying and selling. The 2000—03 bear market in stocks left deep scars, especially among UK pension funds. Falling equity prices depleted assets while lower bond yields increased future liabilities. Defined benefit pension funds fell into deficit and many closed to new entrants. New accounting rules encouraged fund trustees to match assets against liabilities more closely. Many adopted liability-driven investment (LDI) strategies. The impact of this on asset allocation was stark. UK pension funds held roughly half their assets in UK equities in 1999. That weighting fell below 1 per cent in 2025 for defined benefit schemes, according to the Pension Protection Fund. As they sold UK equities, these funds bought into liability-matching index-linked gilts, pushing the weighting up to 31 per cent in 2025.
This was like pouring a gallon into a pint pot. The UK equity market (currently worth some £4.9tn) is much bigger than the linker market (currently about £688bn). And the big move in linker prices was not just happening for domestic reasons. The bond-buying programmes by central banks known as quantitative easing contributed to negative real yields everywhere. This relative valuation shift encouraged the “de-equitisation” of the UK stock market. Listed companies issued debt to buy back shares. Others delisted via debt-financed mergers and acquisitions. But things started to reverse in 2022. Central banks hiked interest rates and began to unwind QE, driving real yields up everywhere. In the UK, the September 2022 mini-Budget spooked the markets and savaged leveraged LDI strategies. Index-linked prices collapsed, pushing real yields back into positive territory for the first time in 10 years. They are still rising amid fiscal concerns and fears of rate hikes. The 15-year real gilt yield is now 2.3 per cent, not far below the FTSE dividend yield of 3.0 per cent. What does this all mean? First, it reduces the financial logic behind de-equitisation. The giant spread between equities and linkers has narrowed, making UK stocks more attractive relative to bonds. Second, it reverses the flow of capital from equities to linkers. Pension funds may start to rebalance back into UK equities, supporting valuations. Third, it challenges the narrative that UK equities are permanently out of favour. The market may be poised for a re-rating as real yields stabilise and investors reassess the risk premium. The era of negative real yields is over, and with it, the era of de-equitisation.
🇸🇦 العربية
إعادة توجيه أسهم المملكة المتحدة وعائدات السندات المرتبطة بالتضخم
For the first half of my career, UK equity valuations closely tracked the yields on the type of gilts where returns are linked to inflation. The 2000–03 bear market broke that neat relationship, but it is making a comeback. As a green young strategist in the early 1990s, I asked my boss how to value the UK stock market. His gruff reply: “It’s simple, equities trade on the same yield as linkers.” That rule of thumb worked for many years. If real yields rose, as in 1994, then equities derated. If real yields fell, as in the late 1990s, they re-rated.
There is a simple logic behind this. Both assets offer an inflation hedge, albeit of different quality. Index-linked gilts adjust principal and coupons in line with the Retail Prices Index. Equities pay dividends that should, theoretically, rise in line with nominal corporate revenues. However, during the early 2000s bear market, the relationship broke. Index-linked prices rose relentlessly, driving the benchmark real yield below zero in 2012 and down to almost minus 3 per cent in 2021. Meanwhile, equity dividend yields drifted higher, including spikes as shares fell during the 2007–09 financial crisis and 2020 Covid pandemic panic. Having matched index-linked yields for the 1980s and 1990s, equities paid a yield premium of 3.3 percentage points on average between 2001 and 2021.
To explain this profound change, I could use technical terms such as equity risk premia, terminal growth, natural rates and the like. But let’s keep it simple. It was about buying and selling. The 2000—03 bear market in stocks left deep scars, especially among UK pension funds. Falling equity prices depleted assets while lower bond yields increased future liabilities. Defined benefit pension funds fell into deficit and many closed to new entrants. New accounting rules encouraged fund trustees to match assets against liabilities more closely. Many adopted liability-driven investment (LDI) strategies. The impact of this on asset allocation was stark. UK pension funds held roughly half their assets in UK equities in 1999. That weighting fell below 1 per cent in 2025 for defined benefit schemes, according to the Pension Protection Fund. As they sold UK equities, these funds bought into liability-matching index-linked gilts, pushing the weighting up to 31 per cent in 2025.
This was like pouring a gallon into a pint pot. The UK equity market (currently worth some £4.9tn) is much bigger than the linker market (currently about £688bn). And the big move in linker prices was not just happening for domestic reasons. The bond-buying programmes by central banks known as quantitative easing contributed to negative real yields everywhere. This relative valuation shift encouraged the “de-equitisation” of the UK stock market. Listed companies issued debt to buy back shares. Others delisted via debt-financed mergers and acquisitions. But things started to reverse in 2022. Central banks hiked interest rates and began to unwind QE, driving real yields up everywhere. In the UK, the September 2022 mini-Budget spooked the markets and savaged leveraged LDI strategies. Index-linked prices collapsed, pushing real yields back into positive territory for the first time in 10 years. They are still rising amid fiscal concerns and fears of rate hikes. The 15-year real gilt yield is now 2.3 per cent, not far below the FTSE dividend yield of 3.0 per cent. What does this all mean? First, it reduces the financial logic behind de-equitisation. The giant spread between equities and linkers has narrowed, making UK stocks more attractive relative to bonds. Second, it reverses the flow of capital from equities to linkers. Pension funds may start to rebalance back into UK equities, supporting valuations. Third, it challenges the narrative that UK equities are permanently out of favour. The market may be poised for a re-rating as real yields stabilise and investors reassess the risk premium. The era of negative real yields is over, and with it, t...
ما الذي تسبب في الاختلاف بين عائدات أسهم المملكة المتحدة وعائدات السندات المرتبطة بالتضخم؟
كان الاختلاف نتيجة لاعتماد صناديق التقاعد في المملكة المتحدة على استراتيجيات الاستثمار الموجهة بالالتزامات (LDI) بعد سوق الهابط 2000–03. فقد باعت هذه الصناديق أسهم المملكة المتحدة واشترت السندات المرتبطة بالتضخم لتطابق الالتزامات، مما رفع أسعار السندات المرتبطة وزيادة عائدات الأسهم. كما ساهم التيسير الكمي في خفض العائدات الحقيقية، مما وسع الفجوة.
🇧🇩 বাংলা
যুক্তরাজ্য শেয়ার এবং সূচক-সংযুক্ত গিল্ট আয়কে পুনরায় সামঞ্জস্য করা
For the first half of my career, UK equity valuations closely tracked the yields on the type of gilts where returns are linked to inflation. The 2000–03 bear market broke that neat relationship, but it is making a comeback. As a green young strategist in the early 1990s, I asked my boss how to value the UK stock market. His gruff reply: “It’s simple, equities trade on the same yield as linkers.” That rule of thumb worked for many years. If real yields rose, as in 1994, then equities derated. If real yields fell, as in the late 1990s, they re-rated.
There is a simple logic behind this. Both assets offer an inflation hedge, albeit of different quality. Index-linked gilts adjust principal and coupons in line with the Retail Prices Index. Equities pay dividends that should, theoretically, rise in line with nominal corporate revenues. However, during the early 2000s bear market, the relationship broke. Index-linked prices rose relentlessly, driving the benchmark real yield below zero in 2012 and down to almost minus 3 per cent in 2021. Meanwhile, equity dividend yields drifted higher, including spikes as shares fell during the 2007–09 financial crisis and 2020 Covid pandemic panic. Having matched index-linked yields for the 1980s and 1990s, equities paid a yield premium of 3.3 percentage points on average between 2001 and 2021.
To explain this profound change, I could use technical terms such as equity risk premia, terminal growth, natural rates and the like. But let’s keep it simple. It was about buying and selling. The 2000—03 bear market in stocks left deep scars, especially among UK pension funds. Falling equity prices depleted assets while lower bond yields increased future liabilities. Defined benefit pension funds fell into deficit and many closed to new entrants. New accounting rules encouraged fund trustees to match assets against liabilities more closely. Many adopted liability-driven investment (LDI) strategies. The impact of this on asset allocation was stark. UK pension funds held roughly half their assets in UK equities in 1999. That weighting fell below 1 per cent in 2025 for defined benefit schemes, according to the Pension Protection Fund. As they sold UK equities, these funds bought into liability-matching index-linked gilts, pushing the weighting up to 31 per cent in 2025.
This was like pouring a gallon into a pint pot. The UK equity market (currently worth some £4.9tn) is much bigger than the linker market (currently about £688bn). And the big move in linker prices was not just happening for domestic reasons. The bond-buying programmes by central banks known as quantitative easing contributed to negative real yields everywhere. This relative valuation shift encouraged the “de-equitisation” of the UK stock market. Listed companies issued debt to buy back shares. Others delisted via debt-financed mergers and acquisitions. But things started to reverse in 2022. Central banks hiked interest rates and began to unwind QE, driving real yields up everywhere. In the UK, the September 2022 mini-Budget spooked the markets and savaged leveraged LDI strategies. Index-linked prices collapsed, pushing real yields back into positive territory for the first time in 10 years. They are still rising amid fiscal concerns and fears of rate hikes. The 15-year real gilt yield is now 2.3 per cent, not far below the FTSE dividend yield of 3.0 per cent. What does this all mean? First, it reduces the financial logic behind de-equitisation. The giant spread between equities and linkers has narrowed, making UK stocks more attractive relative to bonds. Second, it reverses the flow of capital from equities to linkers. Pension funds may start to rebalance back into UK equities, supporting valuations. Third, it challenges the narrative that UK equities are permanently out of favour. The market may be poised for a re-rating as real yields stabilise and investors reassess the risk premium. The era of negative real yields is over, and with it, t...
যুক্তরাজ্য শেয়ার আয়ে এবং সূচক-সংযুক্ত গিল্ট আয়ের মধ্যে ভেদ কেন ঘটেছিল?
ভেদটি ২০০০–০৩ ভেয়ার মার্কেটের পর যুক্তরাজ্য পেনশন ফান্ড들이 দায়বদ্ধ নিবেদন (LDI) কৌশল গ্রহণ করার কারণে ঘটেছিল। তারা যুক্তরাজ্য শেয়ার বेचে দায়বদ্ধ-মেলে গিল্ট কেনে দায়বদ্ধের সাথে মেলানোর চেষ্টা করেছিল, যা গিল্টের দাম বাড়িয়ে এবং শেয়ারের আয়ে বাড়িয়েছিল। পরিমাণগত সহজота (QE) বাস্তব আয়েকে দমন করেছিল, ফলে ফারক বাড়ে গেল।
🇩🇪 Deutsch
Neujustierung der britischen Aktien und der Renditen inflationsgebundener Staatsanleihen
For the first half of my career, UK equity valuations closely tracked the yields on the type of gilts where returns are linked to inflation. The 2000–03 bear market broke that neat relationship, but it is making a comeback. As a green young strategist in the early 1990s, I asked my boss how to value the UK stock market. His gruff reply: “It’s simple, equities trade on the same yield as linkers.” That rule of thumb worked for many years. If real yields rose, as in 1994, then equities derated. If real yields fell, as in the late 1990s, they re-rated.
There is a simple logic behind this. Both assets offer an inflation hedge, albeit of different quality. Index-linked gilts adjust principal and coupons in line with the Retail Prices Index. Equities pay dividends that should, theoretically, rise in line with nominal corporate revenues. However, during the early 2000s bear market, the relationship broke. Index-linked prices rose relentlessly, driving the benchmark real yield below zero in 2012 and down to almost minus 3 per cent in 2021. Meanwhile, equity dividend yields drifted higher, including spikes as shares fell during the 2007–09 financial crisis and 2020 Covid pandemic panic. Having matched index-linked yields for the 1980s and 1990s, equities paid a yield premium of 3.3 percentage points on average between 2001 and 2021.
To explain this profound change, I could use technical terms such as equity risk premia, terminal growth, natural rates and the like. But let’s keep it simple. It was about buying and selling. The 2000—03 bear market in stocks left deep scars, especially among UK pension funds. Falling equity prices depleted assets while lower bond yields increased future liabilities. Defined benefit pension funds fell into deficit and many closed to new entrants. New accounting rules encouraged fund trustees to match assets against liabilities more closely. Many adopted liability-driven investment (LDI) strategies. The impact of this on asset allocation was stark. UK pension funds held roughly half their assets in UK equities in 1999. That weighting fell below 1 per cent in 2025 for defined benefit schemes, according to the Pension Protection Fund. As they sold UK equities, these funds bought into liability-matching index-linked gilts, pushing the weighting up to 31 per cent in 2025.
This was like pouring a gallon into a pint pot. The UK equity market (currently worth some £4.9tn) is much bigger than the linker market (currently about £688bn). And the big move in linker prices was not just happening for domestic reasons. The bond-buying programmes by central banks known as quantitative easing contributed to negative real yields everywhere. This relative valuation shift encouraged the “de-equitisation” of the UK stock market. Listed companies issued debt to buy back shares. Others delisted via debt-financed mergers and acquisitions. But things started to reverse in 2022. Central banks hiked interest rates and began to unwind QE, driving real yields up everywhere. In the UK, the September 2022 mini-Budget spooked the markets and savaged leveraged LDI strategies. Index-linked prices collapsed, pushing real yields back into positive territory for the first time in 10 years. They are still rising amid fiscal concerns and fears of rate hikes. The 15-year real gilt yield is now 2.3 per cent, not far below the FTSE dividend yield of 3.0 per cent. What does this all mean? First, it reduces the financial logic behind de-equitisation. The giant spread between equities and linkers has narrowed, making UK stocks more attractive relative to bonds. Second, it reverses the flow of capital from equities to linkers. Pension funds may start to rebalance back into UK equities, supporting valuations. Third, it challenges the narrative that UK equities are permanently out of favour. The market may be poised for a re-rating as real yields stabilise and investors reassess the risk premium. The era of negative real yields is over, and with it, t...
Was verursachte die Divergenz zwischen den Renditen britischer Aktien und inflationsgebundener Staatsanleihen?
Die Divergenz wurde dadurch verursacht, dass britische Pensionsfonds nach dem Bärenmarkt von 2000–03 börsennotierte Aktien verkauften und stattdessen inflationsgebundene Staatsanleihen kauften, um ihre Verbindlichkeiten abzudecken. Dies trieb die Preise der Staatsanleihen nach oben und erhöhte die Aktienrenditen. Quantitative Lockerung senkte zudem die realen Renditen weltweit und vergrößerte die Spreizung.
🇪🇸 Español
Las acciones del Reino Unido y los rendimientos de los bonos indexados a la inflación se realinean
For the first half of my career, UK equity valuations closely tracked the yields on the type of gilts where returns are linked to inflation. The 2000–03 bear market broke that neat relationship, but it is making a comeback. As a green young strategist in the early 1990s, I asked my boss how to value the UK stock market. His gruff reply: “It’s simple, equities trade on the same yield as linkers.” That rule of thumb worked for many years. If real yields rose, as in 1994, then equities derated. If real yields fell, as in the late 1990s, they re-rated.
There is a simple logic behind this. Both assets offer an inflation hedge, albeit of different quality. Index-linked gilts adjust principal and coupons in line with the Retail Prices Index. Equities pay dividends that should, theoretically, rise in line with nominal corporate revenues. However, during the early 2000s bear market, the relationship broke. Index-linked prices rose relentlessly, driving the benchmark real yield below zero in 2012 and down to almost minus 3 per cent in 2021. Meanwhile, equity dividend yields drifted higher, including spikes as shares fell during the 2007–09 financial crisis and 2020 Covid pandemic panic. Having matched index-linked yields for the 1980s and 1990s, equities paid a yield premium of 3.3 percentage points on average between 2001 and 2021.
To explain this profound change, I could use technical terms such as equity risk premia, terminal growth, natural rates and the like. But let’s keep it simple. It was about buying and selling. The 2000—03 bear market in stocks left deep scars, especially among UK pension funds. Falling equity prices depleted assets while lower bond yields increased future liabilities. Defined benefit pension funds fell into deficit and many closed to new entrants. New accounting rules encouraged fund trustees to match assets against liabilities more closely. Many adopted liability-driven investment (LDI) strategies. The impact of this on asset allocation was stark. UK pension funds held roughly half their assets in UK equities in 1999. That weighting fell below 1 per cent in 2025 for defined benefit schemes, according to the Pension Protection Fund. As they sold UK equities, these funds bought into liability-matching index-linked gilts, pushing the weighting up to 31 per cent in 2025.
This was like pouring a gallon into a pint pot. The UK equity market (currently worth some £4.9tn) is much bigger than the linker market (currently about £688bn). And the big move in linker prices was not just happening for domestic reasons. The bond-buying programmes by central banks known as quantitative easing contributed to negative real yields everywhere. This relative valuation shift encouraged the “de-equitisation” of the UK stock market. Listed companies issued debt to buy back shares. Others delisted via debt-financed mergers and acquisitions. But things started to reverse in 2022. Central banks hiked interest rates and began to unwind QE, driving real yields up everywhere. In the UK, the September 2022 mini-Budget spooked the markets and savaged leveraged LDI strategies. Index-linked prices collapsed, pushing real yields back into positive territory for the first time in 10 years. They are still rising amid fiscal concerns and fears of rate hikes. The 15-year real gilt yield is now 2.3 per cent, not far below the FTSE dividend yield of 3.0 per cent. What does this all mean? First, it reduces the financial logic behind de-equitisation. The giant spread between equities and linkers has narrowed, making UK stocks more attractive relative to bonds. Second, it reverses the flow of capital from equities to linkers. Pension funds may start to rebalance back into UK equities, supporting valuations. Third, it challenges the narrative that UK equities are permanently out of favour. The market may be poised for a re-rating as real yields stabilise and investors reassess the risk premium. The era of negative real yields is over, and with it, t...
¿Qué causó la divergencia entre los rendimientos de las acciones del Reino Unido y los bonos indexados a la inflación?
La divergencia fue impulsada por los fondos de pensiones del Reino Unido que adoptaron estrategias de inversión impulsadas por pasivos (LDI) después del mercado bajista de 2000–03. Vendieron acciones del Reino Unido y compraron bonos indexados para igualar sus pasivos, lo que elevó los precios de los bonos indexados y aumentó los rendimientos de las acciones. El estímulo cuantitativo también suprimió los rendimientos reales, ampliando la brecha.
🇫🇷 Français
Réalignement des actions britanniques et des rendements des obligations indexées sur l'inflation
For the first half of my career, UK equity valuations closely tracked the yields on the type of gilts where returns are linked to inflation. The 2000–03 bear market broke that neat relationship, but it is making a comeback. As a green young strategist in the early 1990s, I asked my boss how to value the UK stock market. His gruff reply: “It’s simple, equities trade on the same yield as linkers.” That rule of thumb worked for many years. If real yields rose, as in 1994, then equities derated. If real yields fell, as in the late 1990s, they re-rated.
There is a simple logic behind this. Both assets offer an inflation hedge, albeit of different quality. Index-linked gilts adjust principal and coupons in line with the Retail Prices Index. Equities pay dividends that should, theoretically, rise in line with nominal corporate revenues. However, during the early 2000s bear market, the relationship broke. Index-linked prices rose relentlessly, driving the benchmark real yield below zero in 2012 and down to almost minus 3 per cent in 2021. Meanwhile, equity dividend yields drifted higher, including spikes as shares fell during the 2007–09 financial crisis and 2020 Covid pandemic panic. Having matched index-linked yields for the 1980s and 1990s, equities paid a yield premium of 3.3 percentage points on average between 2001 and 2021.
To explain this profound change, I could use technical terms such as equity risk premia, terminal growth, natural rates and the like. But let’s keep it simple. It was about buying and selling. The 2000—03 bear market in stocks left deep scars, especially among UK pension funds. Falling equity prices depleted assets while lower bond yields increased future liabilities. Defined benefit pension funds fell into deficit and many closed to new entrants. New accounting rules encouraged fund trustees to match assets against liabilities more closely. Many adopted liability-driven investment (LDI) strategies. The impact of this on asset allocation was stark. UK pension funds held roughly half their assets in UK equities in 1999. That weighting fell below 1 per cent in 2025 for defined benefit schemes, according to the Pension Protection Fund. As they sold UK equities, these funds bought into liability-matching index-linked gilts, pushing the weighting up to 31 per cent in 2025.
This was like pouring a gallon into a pint pot. The UK equity market (currently worth some £4.9tn) is much bigger than the linker market (currently about £688bn). And the big move in linker prices was not just happening for domestic reasons. The bond-buying programmes by central banks known as quantitative easing contributed to negative real yields everywhere. This relative valuation shift encouraged the “de-equitisation” of the UK stock market. Listed companies issued debt to buy back shares. Others delisted via debt-financed mergers and acquisitions. But things started to reverse in 2022. Central banks hiked interest rates and began to unwind QE, driving real yields up everywhere. In the UK, the September 2022 mini-Budget spooked the markets and savaged leveraged LDI strategies. Index-linked prices collapsed, pushing real yields back into positive territory for the first time in 10 years. They are still rising amid fiscal concerns and fears of rate hikes. The 15-year real gilt yield is now 2.3 per cent, not far below the FTSE dividend yield of 3.0 per cent. What does this all mean? First, it reduces the financial logic behind de-equitisation. The giant spread between equities and linkers has narrowed, making UK stocks more attractive relative to bonds. Second, it reverses the flow of capital from equities to linkers. Pension funds may start to rebalance back into UK equities, supporting valuations. Third, it challenges the narrative that UK equities are permanently out of favour. The market may be poised for a re-rating as real yields stabilise and investors reassess the risk premium. The era of negative real yields is over, and with it, t...
Qu'est-ce qui a causé la divergence entre les rendements des actions britanniques et ceux des obligations indexées sur l'inflation ?
La divergence a été provoquée par l'adoption par les fonds de pension britanniques de stratégies d'investissement guidées par le passif (LDI) après le marché baissier de 2000–03. Ils ont vendu des actions britanniques et acheté des obligations indexées pour faire correspondre leurs passifs, ce qui a fait monter les prix des obligations indexées et augmenté les rendements des actions. L'assouplissement quantitatif a également supprimé les rendements réels, élargissant l'écart.
🇮🇳 हिन्दी
यूके इक्विटी और सूचकांक से जुड़े गिल्ट यील्ड्स में फिर से संरेखण
For the first half of my career, UK equity valuations closely tracked the yields on the type of gilts where returns are linked to inflation. The 2000–03 bear market broke that neat relationship, but it is making a comeback. As a green young strategist in the early 1990s, I asked my boss how to value the UK stock market. His gruff reply: “It’s simple, equities trade on the same yield as linkers.” That rule of thumb worked for many years. If real yields rose, as in 1994, then equities derated. If real yields fell, as in the late 1990s, they re-rated.
There is a simple logic behind this. Both assets offer an inflation hedge, albeit of different quality. Index-linked gilts adjust principal and coupons in line with the Retail Prices Index. Equities pay dividends that should, theoretically, rise in line with nominal corporate revenues. However, during the early 2000s bear market, the relationship broke. Index-linked prices rose relentlessly, driving the benchmark real yield below zero in 2012 and down to almost minus 3 per cent in 2021. Meanwhile, equity dividend yields drifted higher, including spikes as shares fell during the 2007–09 financial crisis and 2020 Covid pandemic panic. Having matched index-linked yields for the 1980s and 1990s, equities paid a yield premium of 3.3 percentage points on average between 2001 and 2021.
To explain this profound change, I could use technical terms such as equity risk premia, terminal growth, natural rates and the like. But let’s keep it simple. It was about buying and selling. The 2000—03 bear market in stocks left deep scars, especially among UK pension funds. Falling equity prices depleted assets while lower bond yields increased future liabilities. Defined benefit pension funds fell into deficit and many closed to new entrants. New accounting rules encouraged fund trustees to match assets against liabilities more closely. Many adopted liability-driven investment (LDI) strategies. The impact of this on asset allocation was stark. UK pension funds held roughly half their assets in UK equities in 1999. That weighting fell below 1 per cent in 2025 for defined benefit schemes, according to the Pension Protection Fund. As they sold UK equities, these funds bought into liability-matching index-linked gilts, pushing the weighting up to 31 per cent in 2025.
This was like pouring a gallon into a pint pot. The UK equity market (currently worth some £4.9tn) is much bigger than the linker market (currently about £688bn). And the big move in linker prices was not just happening for domestic reasons. The bond-buying programmes by central banks known as quantitative easing contributed to negative real yields everywhere. This relative valuation shift encouraged the “de-equitisation” of the UK stock market. Listed companies issued debt to buy back shares. Others delisted via debt-financed mergers and acquisitions. But things started to reverse in 2022. Central banks hiked interest rates and began to unwind QE, driving real yields up everywhere. In the UK, the September 2022 mini-Budget spooked the markets and savaged leveraged LDI strategies. Index-linked prices collapsed, pushing real yields back into positive territory for the first time in 10 years. They are still rising amid fiscal concerns and fears of rate hikes. The 15-year real gilt yield is now 2.3 per cent, not far below the FTSE dividend yield of 3.0 per cent. What does this all mean? First, it reduces the financial logic behind de-equitisation. The giant spread between equities and linkers has narrowed, making UK stocks more attractive relative to bonds. Second, it reverses the flow of capital from equities to linkers. Pension funds may start to rebalance back into UK equities, supporting valuations. Third, it challenges the narrative that UK equities are permanently out of favour. The market may be poised for a re-rating as real yields stabilise and investors reassess the risk premium. The era of negative real yields is over, and with it, t...
यूके इक्विटी यील्ड्स और सूचकांक से जुड़े गिल्ट यील्ड्स के बीच विचलन किसके कारण हुआ?
विचलन का कारण 2000–03 के भालू बाजार के बाद यूके पेंशन फंड्स द्वारा देनदारी-निर्देशित निवेश (LDI) रणनीतियों को अपनाना था। उन्होंने यूके इक्विटी बेचीं और देनदारियों से मेल खाने वाले सूचकांक से जुड़े गिल्ट्स खरीदे, जिससे गिल्ट की कीमतें बढ़ीं और इक्विटी यील्ड्स बढ़ीं। मात्रात्मक सहजता ने भी वास्तविक यील्ड्स को दबा दिया, जिससे फैलाव बढ़ा।
🇮🇩 Bahasa Indonesia
Realignasi Saham Inggris dan Rendement Obligasi Terindeks Inflasi
For the first half of my career, UK equity valuations closely tracked the yields on the type of gilts where returns are linked to inflation. The 2000–03 bear market broke that neat relationship, but it is making a comeback. As a green young strategist in the early 1990s, I asked my boss how to value the UK stock market. His gruff reply: “It’s simple, equities trade on the same yield as linkers.” That rule of thumb worked for many years. If real yields rose, as in 1994, then equities derated. If real yields fell, as in the late 1990s, they re-rated.
There is a simple logic behind this. Both assets offer an inflation hedge, albeit of different quality. Index-linked gilts adjust principal and coupons in line with the Retail Prices Index. Equities pay dividends that should, theoretically, rise in line with nominal corporate revenues. However, during the early 2000s bear market, the relationship broke. Index-linked prices rose relentlessly, driving the benchmark real yield below zero in 2012 and down to almost minus 3 per cent in 2021. Meanwhile, equity dividend yields drifted higher, including spikes as shares fell during the 2007–09 financial crisis and 2020 Covid pandemic panic. Having matched index-linked yields for the 1980s and 1990s, equities paid a yield premium of 3.3 percentage points on average between 2001 and 2021.
To explain this profound change, I could use technical terms such as equity risk premia, terminal growth, natural rates and the like. But let’s keep it simple. It was about buying and selling. The 2000—03 bear market in stocks left deep scars, especially among UK pension funds. Falling equity prices depleted assets while lower bond yields increased future liabilities. Defined benefit pension funds fell into deficit and many closed to new entrants. New accounting rules encouraged fund trustees to match assets against liabilities more closely. Many adopted liability-driven investment (LDI) strategies. The impact of this on asset allocation was stark. UK pension funds held roughly half their assets in UK equities in 1999. That weighting fell below 1 per cent in 2025 for defined benefit schemes, according to the Pension Protection Fund. As they sold UK equities, these funds bought into liability-matching index-linked gilts, pushing the weighting up to 31 per cent in 2025.
This was like pouring a gallon into a pint pot. The UK equity market (currently worth some £4.9tn) is much bigger than the linker market (currently about £688bn). And the big move in linker prices was not just happening for domestic reasons. The bond-buying programmes by central banks known as quantitative easing contributed to negative real yields everywhere. This relative valuation shift encouraged the “de-equitisation” of the UK stock market. Listed companies issued debt to buy back shares. Others delisted via debt-financed mergers and acquisitions. But things started to reverse in 2022. Central banks hiked interest rates and began to unwind QE, driving real yields up everywhere. In the UK, the September 2022 mini-Budget spooked the markets and savaged leveraged LDI strategies. Index-linked prices collapsed, pushing real yields back into positive territory for the first time in 10 years. They are still rising amid fiscal concerns and fears of rate hikes. The 15-year real gilt yield is now 2.3 per cent, not far below the FTSE dividend yield of 3.0 per cent. What does this all mean? First, it reduces the financial logic behind de-equitisation. The giant spread between equities and linkers has narrowed, making UK stocks more attractive relative to bonds. Second, it reverses the flow of capital from equities to linkers. Pension funds may start to rebalance back into UK equities, supporting valuations. Third, it challenges the narrative that UK equities are permanently out of favour. The market may be poised for a re-rating as real yields stabilise and investors reassess the risk premium. The era of negative real yields is over, and with it, t...
Apa yang menyebabkan divergensi antara rendement saham Inggris dan rendement obligasi terindeks inflasi?
Divergensi ini disebabkan oleh adopsi strategi investasi yang didorong oleh kewajiban (LDI) oleh dana pensiun Inggris setelah pasar bear 2000–03. Mereka menjual saham Inggris dan membeli obligasi terindeks inflasi untuk mencocokkan kewajiban, yang mendorong harga obligasi naik dan rendement saham naik. Kuantitatif easing juga menekan rendement nyata, memperlebar selisih.
🇯🇵 日本語
英国株式とインフレ連動ギルト利回りの再調整
For the first half of my career, UK equity valuations closely tracked the yields on the type of gilts where returns are linked to inflation. The 2000–03 bear market broke that neat relationship, but it is making a comeback. As a green young strategist in the early 1990s, I asked my boss how to value the UK stock market. His gruff reply: “It’s simple, equities trade on the same yield as linkers.” That rule of thumb worked for many years. If real yields rose, as in 1994, then equities derated. If real yields fell, as in the late 1990s, they re-rated.
There is a simple logic behind this. Both assets offer an inflation hedge, albeit of different quality. Index-linked gilts adjust principal and coupons in line with the Retail Prices Index. Equities pay dividends that should, theoretically, rise in line with nominal corporate revenues. However, during the early 2000s bear market, the relationship broke. Index-linked prices rose relentlessly, driving the benchmark real yield below zero in 2012 and down to almost minus 3 per cent in 2021. Meanwhile, equity dividend yields drifted higher, including spikes as shares fell during the 2007–09 financial crisis and 2020 Covid pandemic panic. Having matched index-linked yields for the 1980s and 1990s, equities paid a yield premium of 3.3 percentage points on average between 2001 and 2021.
To explain this profound change, I could use technical terms such as equity risk premia, terminal growth, natural rates and the like. But let’s keep it simple. It was about buying and selling. The 2000—03 bear market in stocks left deep scars, especially among UK pension funds. Falling equity prices depleted assets while lower bond yields increased future liabilities. Defined benefit pension funds fell into deficit and many closed to new entrants. New accounting rules encouraged fund trustees to match assets against liabilities more closely. Many adopted liability-driven investment (LDI) strategies. The impact of this on asset allocation was stark. UK pension funds held roughly half their assets in UK equities in 1999. That weighting fell below 1 per cent in 2025 for defined benefit schemes, according to the Pension Protection Fund. As they sold UK equities, these funds bought into liability-matching index-linked gilts, pushing the weighting up to 31 per cent in 2025.
This was like pouring a gallon into a pint pot. The UK equity market (currently worth some £4.9tn) is much bigger than the linker market (currently about £688bn). And the big move in linker prices was not just happening for domestic reasons. The bond-buying programmes by central banks known as quantitative easing contributed to negative real yields everywhere. This relative valuation shift encouraged the “de-equitisation” of the UK stock market. Listed companies issued debt to buy back shares. Others delisted via debt-financed mergers and acquisitions. But things started to reverse in 2022. Central banks hiked interest rates and began to unwind QE, driving real yields up everywhere. In the UK, the September 2022 mini-Budget spooked the markets and savaged leveraged LDI strategies. Index-linked prices collapsed, pushing real yields back into positive territory for the first time in 10 years. They are still rising amid fiscal concerns and fears of rate hikes. The 15-year real gilt yield is now 2.3 per cent, not far below the FTSE dividend yield of 3.0 per cent. What does this all mean? First, it reduces the financial logic behind de-equitisation. The giant spread between equities and linkers has narrowed, making UK stocks more attractive relative to bonds. Second, it reverses the flow of capital from equities to linkers. Pension funds may start to rebalance back into UK equities, supporting valuations. Third, it challenges the narrative that UK equities are permanently out of favour. The market may be poised for a re-rating as real yields stabilise and investors reassess the risk premium. The era of negative real yields is over, and with it, t...
英国株式の利回りとインフレ連動ギルト利回りの乖離は何が原因でしたか?
乖離の原因は、2000–03年のベアマーケット後に英国の年金基金が負債駆動型投資(LDI)戦略を採用したことです。彼らは英国株式を売却し、負債に合わせたインフレ連動ギルトを購入しました。これによりギルト価格が上昇し、株式の利回りが上昇しました。さらに、量的緩和(QE)が実際の利回りを抑制し、この開きを広げました。
🇧🇷 Português
Realinhamento das ações do Reino Unido e dos rendimentos dos títulos indexados à inflação
For the first half of my career, UK equity valuations closely tracked the yields on the type of gilts where returns are linked to inflation. The 2000–03 bear market broke that neat relationship, but it is making a comeback. As a green young strategist in the early 1990s, I asked my boss how to value the UK stock market. His gruff reply: “It’s simple, equities trade on the same yield as linkers.” That rule of thumb worked for many years. If real yields rose, as in 1994, then equities derated. If real yields fell, as in the late 1990s, they re-rated.
There is a simple logic behind this. Both assets offer an inflation hedge, albeit of different quality. Index-linked gilts adjust principal and coupons in line with the Retail Prices Index. Equities pay dividends that should, theoretically, rise in line with nominal corporate revenues. However, during the early 2000s bear market, the relationship broke. Index-linked prices rose relentlessly, driving the benchmark real yield below zero in 2012 and down to almost minus 3 per cent in 2021. Meanwhile, equity dividend yields drifted higher, including spikes as shares fell during the 2007–09 financial crisis and 2020 Covid pandemic panic. Having matched index-linked yields for the 1980s and 1990s, equities paid a yield premium of 3.3 percentage points on average between 2001 and 2021.
To explain this profound change, I could use technical terms such as equity risk premia, terminal growth, natural rates and the like. But let’s keep it simple. It was about buying and selling. The 2000—03 bear market in stocks left deep scars, especially among UK pension funds. Falling equity prices depleted assets while lower bond yields increased future liabilities. Defined benefit pension funds fell into deficit and many closed to new entrants. New accounting rules encouraged fund trustees to match assets against liabilities more closely. Many adopted liability-driven investment (LDI) strategies. The impact of this on asset allocation was stark. UK pension funds held roughly half their assets in UK equities in 1999. That weighting fell below 1 per cent in 2025 for defined benefit schemes, according to the Pension Protection Fund. As they sold UK equities, these funds bought into liability-matching index-linked gilts, pushing the weighting up to 31 per cent in 2025.
This was like pouring a gallon into a pint pot. The UK equity market (currently worth some £4.9tn) is much bigger than the linker market (currently about £688bn). And the big move in linker prices was not just happening for domestic reasons. The bond-buying programmes by central banks known as quantitative easing contributed to negative real yields everywhere. This relative valuation shift encouraged the “de-equitisation” of the UK stock market. Listed companies issued debt to buy back shares. Others delisted via debt-financed mergers and acquisitions. But things started to reverse in 2022. Central banks hiked interest rates and began to unwind QE, driving real yields up everywhere. In the UK, the September 2022 mini-Budget spooked the markets and savaged leveraged LDI strategies. Index-linked prices collapsed, pushing real yields back into positive territory for the first time in 10 years. They are still rising amid fiscal concerns and fears of rate hikes. The 15-year real gilt yield is now 2.3 per cent, not far below the FTSE dividend yield of 3.0 per cent. What does this all mean? First, it reduces the financial logic behind de-equitisation. The giant spread between equities and linkers has narrowed, making UK stocks more attractive relative to bonds. Second, it reverses the flow of capital from equities to linkers. Pension funds may start to rebalance back into UK equities, supporting valuations. Third, it challenges the narrative that UK equities are permanently out of favour. The market may be poised for a re-rating as real yields stabilise and investors reassess the risk premium. The era of negative real yields is over, and with it, t...
O que causou a divergência entre os rendimentos das ações do Reino Unido e os rendimentos dos títulos indexados à inflação?
A divergência foi impulsionada pela adoção de estratégias de investimento orientadas por passivos (LDI) pelos fundos de pensão do Reino Unido após o mercado baixista de 2000–03. Eles venderam ações do Reino Unido e compraram títulos indexados para corresponder às suas obrigações, elevando os preços dos títulos indexados e aumentando os rendimentos das ações. O estímulo quantitativo também suprimiu os rendimentos reais, ampliando a diferença.
🇷🇺 Русский
Повторное выравнивание доходности акций Великобритании и индексированных гилтов
For the first half of my career, UK equity valuations closely tracked the yields on the type of gilts where returns are linked to inflation. The 2000–03 bear market broke that neat relationship, but it is making a comeback. As a green young strategist in the early 1990s, I asked my boss how to value the UK stock market. His gruff reply: “It’s simple, equities trade on the same yield as linkers.” That rule of thumb worked for many years. If real yields rose, as in 1994, then equities derated. If real yields fell, as in the late 1990s, they re-rated.
There is a simple logic behind this. Both assets offer an inflation hedge, albeit of different quality. Index-linked gilts adjust principal and coupons in line with the Retail Prices Index. Equities pay dividends that should, theoretically, rise in line with nominal corporate revenues. However, during the early 2000s bear market, the relationship broke. Index-linked prices rose relentlessly, driving the benchmark real yield below zero in 2012 and down to almost minus 3 per cent in 2021. Meanwhile, equity dividend yields drifted higher, including spikes as shares fell during the 2007–09 financial crisis and 2020 Covid pandemic panic. Having matched index-linked yields for the 1980s and 1990s, equities paid a yield premium of 3.3 percentage points on average between 2001 and 2021.
To explain this profound change, I could use technical terms such as equity risk premia, terminal growth, natural rates and the like. But let’s keep it simple. It was about buying and selling. The 2000—03 bear market in stocks left deep scars, especially among UK pension funds. Falling equity prices depleted assets while lower bond yields increased future liabilities. Defined benefit pension funds fell into deficit and many closed to new entrants. New accounting rules encouraged fund trustees to match assets against liabilities more closely. Many adopted liability-driven investment (LDI) strategies. The impact of this on asset allocation was stark. UK pension funds held roughly half their assets in UK equities in 1999. That weighting fell below 1 per cent in 2025 for defined benefit schemes, according to the Pension Protection Fund. As they sold UK equities, these funds bought into liability-matching index-linked gilts, pushing the weighting up to 31 per cent in 2025.
This was like pouring a gallon into a pint pot. The UK equity market (currently worth some £4.9tn) is much bigger than the linker market (currently about £688bn). And the big move in linker prices was not just happening for domestic reasons. The bond-buying programmes by central banks known as quantitative easing contributed to negative real yields everywhere. This relative valuation shift encouraged the “de-equitisation” of the UK stock market. Listed companies issued debt to buy back shares. Others delisted via debt-financed mergers and acquisitions. But things started to reverse in 2022. Central banks hiked interest rates and began to unwind QE, driving real yields up everywhere. In the UK, the September 2022 mini-Budget spooked the markets and savaged leveraged LDI strategies. Index-linked prices collapsed, pushing real yields back into positive territory for the first time in 10 years. They are still rising amid fiscal concerns and fears of rate hikes. The 15-year real gilt yield is now 2.3 per cent, not far below the FTSE dividend yield of 3.0 per cent. What does this all mean? First, it reduces the financial logic behind de-equitisation. The giant spread between equities and linkers has narrowed, making UK stocks more attractive relative to bonds. Second, it reverses the flow of capital from equities to linkers. Pension funds may start to rebalance back into UK equities, supporting valuations. Third, it challenges the narrative that UK equities are permanently out of favour. The market may be poised for a re-rating as real yields stabilise and investors reassess the risk premium. The era of negative real yields is over, and with it, t...
Что привело к расхождению между доходностью акций Великобритании и доходностью индексированных гилтов?
Расхождение было вызвано тем, что после медвежьего рынка 2000–03 гг. пенсионные фонды Великобритании начали использовать стратегии инвестирования, ориентированные на обязательства (LDI). Они продавали акции Великобритании и покупали индексированные гилты, чтобы сопоставить свои обязательства, что привело к росту цен на гилты и увеличению доходности акций. Количественное смягчение также подавляло реальную доходность, увеличивая разрыв.
🇨🇳 简体中文
英国股票和通胀挂钩国债收益率重新对齐
For the first half of my career, UK equity valuations closely tracked the yields on the type of gilts where returns are linked to inflation. The 2000–03 bear market broke that neat relationship, but it is making a comeback. As a green young strategist in the early 1990s, I asked my boss how to value the UK stock market. His gruff reply: “It’s simple, equities trade on the same yield as linkers.” That rule of thumb worked for many years. If real yields rose, as in 1994, then equities derated. If real yields fell, as in the late 1990s, they re-rated.
There is a simple logic behind this. Both assets offer an inflation hedge, albeit of different quality. Index-linked gilts adjust principal and coupons in line with the Retail Prices Index. Equities pay dividends that should, theoretically, rise in line with nominal corporate revenues. However, during the early 2000s bear market, the relationship broke. Index-linked prices rose relentlessly, driving the benchmark real yield below zero in 2012 and down to almost minus 3 per cent in 2021. Meanwhile, equity dividend yields drifted higher, including spikes as shares fell during the 2007–09 financial crisis and 2020 Covid pandemic panic. Having matched index-linked yields for the 1980s and 1990s, equities paid a yield premium of 3.3 percentage points on average between 2001 and 2021.
To explain this profound change, I could use technical terms such as equity risk premia, terminal growth, natural rates and the like. But let’s keep it simple. It was about buying and selling. The 2000—03 bear market in stocks left deep scars, especially among UK pension funds. Falling equity prices depleted assets while lower bond yields increased future liabilities. Defined benefit pension funds fell into deficit and many closed to new entrants. New accounting rules encouraged fund trustees to match assets against liabilities more closely. Many adopted liability-driven investment (LDI) strategies. The impact of this on asset allocation was stark. UK pension funds held roughly half their assets in UK equities in 1999. That weighting fell below 1 per cent in 2025 for defined benefit schemes, according to the Pension Protection Fund. As they sold UK equities, these funds bought into liability-matching index-linked gilts, pushing the weighting up to 31 per cent in 2025.
This was like pouring a gallon into a pint pot. The UK equity market (currently worth some £4.9tn) is much bigger than the linker market (currently about £688bn). And the big move in linker prices was not just happening for domestic reasons. The bond-buying programmes by central banks known as quantitative easing contributed to negative real yields everywhere. This relative valuation shift encouraged the “de-equitisation” of the UK stock market. Listed companies issued debt to buy back shares. Others delisted via debt-financed mergers and acquisitions. But things started to reverse in 2022. Central banks hiked interest rates and began to unwind QE, driving real yields up everywhere. In the UK, the September 2022 mini-Budget spooked the markets and savaged leveraged LDI strategies. Index-linked prices collapsed, pushing real yields back into positive territory for the first time in 10 years. They are still rising amid fiscal concerns and fears of rate hikes. The 15-year real gilt yield is now 2.3 per cent, not far below the FTSE dividend yield of 3.0 per cent. What does this all mean? First, it reduces the financial logic behind de-equitisation. The giant spread between equities and linkers has narrowed, making UK stocks more attractive relative to bonds. Second, it reverses the flow of capital from equities to linkers. Pension funds may start to rebalance back into UK equities, supporting valuations. Third, it challenges the narrative that UK equities are permanently out of favour. The market may be poised for a re-rating as real yields stabilise and investors reassess the risk premium. The era of negative real yields is over, and with it, t...
什么导致了英国股票收益率与通胀挂钩国债收益率之间的分歧?
分歧的原因是,在2000–03年熊市后,英国养老金基金采用了负债驱动型投资(LDI)策略。他们出售英国股票并购买通胀挂钩国债以匹配负债,推高了链接债券价格并提升了股票收益率。量化宽松也压制了真实收益率,扩大了这一差距。