HeadlinesBriefing favicon HeadlinesBriefing.com

Ring introduces better default encryption standards

Engadget •
×

Ring is addressing some of its privacy issues by overhauling how it handles encryption by default. The Amazon-owned company just introduced something called TAKE, which stands for Throw Away the Key Encryption that it claims will improve privacy while still enabling smart home features. The newly-introduced platform protects Ring videos with "unique, rotating encryption keys." A copy of these keys is sent to "a secure enclave within the cloud." The company only uses these keys to activate whatever active smart home features a user has enabled and, after that, they are deleted from the cloud.

Ring customers will still have access to the footage via enrolled devices, and these videos can be shared with trusted users. The important bit here is that Ring, the company, doesn't have prolonged access to these videos. The company uses a house key analogy here, writing that the person who "made your lock doesn't keep a copy of the key." TAKE will start rolling out in September, though it might take a bit to reach every Ring user.

In the meantime, the company already lets people access full end-to-end encryption, which cuts out the company entirely. Of course, this could also limit many smart home features. This is fairly good news for Ring users, though the company has an absolute dumpster-fire reputation when it comes to privacy. For years, police could request security camera footage from Ring and not even have to disclose anything publicly. This could even happen without permission from the person who bought the camera. It finally ended this request-for-access feature for law enforcement in 2024.

However, Ring did partner up with everyone's favorite surveillance company Flock after that to do something similar. That integration would've let users share camera footage with police upon request. The program never reached the public and was officially cancelled, as Ring said it required "significantly more time and resources" than expected. However, this was seen as a likely response to public backlash.