U.S. leaders must prioritize visits to China to counter miscalculations and deepen understanding of its economic and geopolitical strategies. The article argues that reduced high-level travel since 2020 has left policymakers reliant on outdated assumptions, exemplified by Trump’s 2023 tariff retreat after underestimating China’s resilience. Firsthand exposure to China’s advanced manufacturing, technological ecosystems, and state-driven industries would inform realistic policy debates and reduce theatrical posturing in U.S.-China relations.

The decline in congressional and presidential visits—from 177 lawmakers in delegations between 2010-2019 to near zero post-2020—has eroded critical dialogue. Historical parallels highlight the value of engagement: Nixon’s 1972 trip paved the way for normalized relations, while recent bipartisan efforts, like Senator Schumer’s 2023 delegation pressing China on fentanyl precursors, show tangible diplomatic gains. Without such exchanges, U.S. strategies risk being reactive rather than proactive amid intensifying competition.

Restoring travel requires addressing security concerns without overcorrection. Proposals include reviving the Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act’s travel programs, mandating transparency in funding and itineraries, and banning lobbyist participation. These measures would mitigate risks of espionage while enabling officials to assess China’s internal debates and decision-making processes. The authors stress that avoiding visits perpetuates policies based on “stale assumptions” and incomplete data.

Reinstating U.S.-China travel is urgent to align policy with China’s rapid advancements. For instance, witnessing Shanghai’s infrastructure firsthand led Representative Ro Khanna to advocate for more trips. Without direct engagement, U.S. competitiveness initiatives like the CHIPS and Science Act may falter against China’s integrated industrial ecosystems. The article concludes that strategic clarity demands leaders experience China’s realities—not just rhetoric.