Event Strategies Inc., a firm tied to President Trump’s inner circle, secured $13 million in no-bid federal contracts under the second Trump administration, transforming it into the government’s top-paid event planner. The contracts, awarded without competitive bidding, include high-profile events like the Navy’s 250th birthday celebration and a Treasury Department initiative promoting “Trump accounts” for children’s savings. Critics argue this flouts procurement laws meant to ensure fair competition, with $22 million in contracts since Trump’s return—far exceeding the 3% exemption rate seen in other event planning deals.

The firm, founded by Washington insiders with ties to Trump’s 2015 campaign, faced backlash after organizing the Jan. 6 rally on the Ellipse, which preceded the Capitol attack. Despite this, it regained favor, landing contracts defended by agencies citing “urgency” or “specialized expertise.” For instance, the Navy claimed Event Strategies was the “only vendor” capable of executing a Norfolk celebration within deadlines. The Treasury Department similarly cited a “condensed timeline” for its contract.

The administration insists it followed standard processes, with White House spokesman Davis Ingle stating, “There is a standard federal process.” However, legal experts like Jessica Tillipman, a procurement law professor, question whether agencies had legitimate grounds to bypass competitive bidding. Comparisons to the Kristi Noem media contract scandal—where urgency exemptions led to her firing—highlight ongoing political risks. Event Strategies’ president, Tim Unes, emphasized the company’s “years of experience” but declined further comment.

This pattern underscores tensions between Trump’s “drain the swamp” rhetoric and alleged cronyism. With $67 million in political donations from pro-Trump groups since 2015, Event Strategies exemplifies how connections may influence taxpayer-funded decisions. As agencies expand pre-approved vendor lists, watchdogs warn of eroded accountability. The firm’s ability to secure lucrative deals without public scrutiny remains a focal point for investigators and lawmakers alike.