The New York Times editors reveal their approach to covering congressional hearings, where lawmakers and witnesses often perform for cameras rather than engage in substantive dialogue. Three editors from the Washington bureau discussed how they navigate the theatrical nature of these events while maintaining journalistic integrity.

Margaret Ho, Justice Department and fact-checking editor, explained that strong hearing coverage requires sharp analysis and critical context. The team evaluates whether to publish updates based on their analytical value, sometimes combining similar observations from multiple reporters. When officials make misleading statements, the Times immediately fact-checks in the same breath.

Julie Hirschfeld Davis, congressional editor, emphasized preparation through researching witnesses' records and lawmakers' likely lines of questioning. She noted that while grandstanding has always existed, social media has amplified the search for viral moments. The team watches for spontaneous exchanges that reveal deeper truths about political dynamics, rather than simply relaying prepared statements.