The New York Times publishes a scathing critique labeling Elon Musk a menace to society, questioning why the owner of X receives a pass for his conduct on the platform. The piece challenges the lack of accountability for Musk's statements and actions as proprietor of the social media giant formerly known as Twitter.

Critics argue that Musk's dual role as platform owner and most-followed user creates an unprecedented concentration of influence. His policy decisions, algorithmic changes, and personal posts shape global discourse without meaningful oversight. The article highlights instances where Musk amplified conspiracy theories, attacked journalists, and reinstated previously banned accounts.

Defenders counter that Musk champions free speech and that market forces, not editorial boards, should govern platforms. Yet the Times contends that ownership confers responsibility, not immunity. The debate centers on whether one individual should wield unchecked power over a digital town square used by hundreds of millions.