Saudi Arabia conducted retaliatory strikes against Iran following missile and drone attacks launched by Tehran against the kingdom's energy facilities and civilian infrastructure. These actions were framed as a defense mechanism, signaling Riyadh's willingness to protect itself, while simultaneously communicating to Tehran that Saudi Arabia is not participating in the broader US-Israeli military campaign against Iran. The escalation underscores the rapid regional spread of the conflict, which began after Iran lashed out against its Arab neighbors to increase the costs associated with the war for the US and its allies. Initially, Saudi Arabia had urged the US against starting the war and sought a diplomatic resolution, warning of potential strikes on its energy sector. Riyadh had also refused to allow US forces to use its territory for offensive operations against Iran. However, the strikes against Saudi infrastructure prompted a shift in policy. Experts suggest the attacks were carefully calibrated to maintain deterrence without triggering an all-out war, with open communication channels maintained with Tehran to prevent uncontrolled escalation. Sources indicate the strikes were coordinated, with Iran potentially being informed beforehand to establish a 'modus vivendi.'

Key Points:

- Saudi Arabia launched strikes against Iran in response to Tehran's attacks on Saudi energy and civilian infrastructure.

- Riyadh emphasized that the strikes were defensive and intended to maintain deterrence, not join the broader US-Israeli military campaign.

- Communication channels remained open between Riyadh and Tehran to limit escalation, suggesting a coordinated effort to manage the conflict's scope.

**