During a Nevada Federal District Court hearing, UFC president Dana White testified that he is not directly involved in fighter matchmaking or contract negotiations. White stated that his delegates, including Hunter Campbell, handle these aspects of the business. This revelation came during an antitrust lawsuit, casting a spotlight on the inner workings of the organization.

Since 2017, White's involvement has been limited to the broader strategic vision of the UFC, focusing on the promotion's growth. Campbell confirmed that White doesn't review fighter contracts. The court is examining whether communication devices were improperly handled in relation to antitrust lawsuits filed by former fighters, seeking damages and changes to UFC practices.

This testimony is significant as it could influence the outcome of the antitrust lawsuits brought by former fighters. These suits challenge the UFC's business practices, particularly concerning fighter contracts. In 2025, the UFC agreed to pay a large sum to former fighters, highlighting the ongoing legal battles over fighter compensation and promotional opportunities.

What's next? The legal proceedings will likely continue to delve into the details of the UFC's operations. The outcome could have a considerable impact on how fighters are compensated and the overall structure of the MMA promotion. This case is another chapter in the ongoing scrutiny of the sport's business practices.