Montana voters are considering a referendum that would ban corporate campaign contributions, potentially circumventing the Citizens United ruling without a constitutional amendment. The proposal represents an unusual political alliance in deep red Montana, where voters would decide whether to restrict corporate money in state elections. This approach could create a model for other states seeking to limit corporate influence without federal intervention.

Robert Reich explains the mechanics behind this strategy in a widely viewed video that has garnered over 36,000 views in its first day. The plan leverages state-level authority to impose contribution limits that effectively neutralize the impact of Citizens United at the state level. While federal rulings prevent states from restricting independent expenditures, Montana's approach focuses on direct corporate contributions to candidates and parties.

This referendum represents a significant test of whether states can reclaim some control over campaign finance despite federal precedents. If successful, Montana's model could inspire similar initiatives across the political spectrum, particularly in states seeking to reduce corporate influence in local politics.