HeadlinesBriefing favicon HeadlinesBriefing.com

Xi Leverages Mao's Strategy for China's Long-Term Victory

New York Times Top Stories •
×

Xi Jinping is reframing China's rivalry with the United States through Mao Zedong's 1938 essay on protracted war, positioning it as a blueprint for eventual dominance. The Chinese leader has explicitly endorsed Mao's three-phase strategy, shifting from defense to a calculated stalemate where China builds strength while pressuring the U.S. This approach has already borne fruit: China countered Trump-era tariffs with export controls on critical minerals, forcing a strategic retreat. By embracing this framework, Xi signals confidence in China's growing industrial, technological, and military capabilities despite domestic challenges.

The essay's resurgence reflects how the Communist Party leverages historical narratives to legitimize its geopolitical goals. China's leaders now view the U.S.-led order as declining, seeking to exploit this perceived weakness. Recent moves include deepening ties with Russia and Southeast Asia, while hosting allies like Canada and Germany in Beijing to underscore U.S. isolation. Domestically, China faces aging demographics and debt issues, yet its leadership insists the U.S. is the weaker party. This narrative is amplified by state media and academic discourse, framing the rivalry as a moral and strategic contest. The current stalemate allows China to consolidate power without immediate military confrontation, focusing instead on incremental gains in trade and technology.

The implications for global markets and U.S. interests are profound. China's emphasis on critical minerals and tech self-sufficiency threatens U.S. supply chains, while its diplomatic outreach could erode Western alliances. For investors, the shift signals long-term risks in tech dependencies and trade policies. Meanwhile, Trump's focus on short-term deals and optics contrasts sharply with Xi's strategic patience. The visit to Beijing may yield symbolic gestures, but Xi's priority remains advancing China's position in a prolonged contest. The essay's enduring relevance underscores a fundamental belief: China's rise is inevitable, and the U.S. must adapt or face gradual decline.