Senate Republicans raised serious doubts about the emerging U.S.-Iran peace framework, with President Trump's closest allies calling the deal flawed. Senator Thom Tillis questioned Iran's commitment to reopening the Strait of Hormuz, while Senator Roger Wicker warned a 60-day ceasefire would be disastrous. The criticism comes as U.S. and Iranian officials describe a framework involving Iran disposing of highly enriched uranium.

The emerging agreement would reopen the Strait of Hormuz and sees Iran commit to disposing of its highly enriched uranium stockpile. Senator Lindsey Graham argued striking a deal now would make the U.S. appear as recognizing Iran as a dominant force, calling it "a nightmare for Israel." Senator Ted Cruz labeled any outcome allowing Iran to retain Hormuz control "a disastrous mistake."

Trump fired back on social media, calling critics "losers, who are critical about something they know nothing about." Speaker Mike Johnson expressed confidence the deal would address nuclear concerns, while Senator Rand Paul urged patience. The debate reflects deep divisions within the Republican party over how to handle Iran's nuclear program.

The framework marks the first major diplomatic breakthrough since the conflict began nearly three months ago. With markets watching potential oil supply routes and shipping security, the deal's terms carry significant economic weight for global trade.