Meta and YouTube were found negligent in a landmark Los Angeles trial for designing platforms that allegedly harmed a young user. The jury ruled that features like infinite scroll and algorithmic recommendations contributed to the plaintiff’s anxiety and depression, validating a legal theory comparing social media addiction to harmful products like cigarettes. The companies were ordered to pay $6 million in damages, a relatively small sum for their scale, but the verdict could set a precedent for future lawsuits targeting tech giants.

The case, brought by a woman now 20, highlights growing scrutiny over how social media platforms prioritize engagement over user well-being. While the financial penalty is modest, legal experts suggest it may embolden similar claims, potentially forcing companies to redesign addictive features or face larger liabilities. The ruling underscores regulators’ increasing focus on holding tech accountable for mental health impacts.

Iran’s leaders publicly rejected a U.S.-brokered cease-fire proposal but signaled private willingness to negotiate in Pakistan. Meanwhile, Russia intensified attacks on Ukraine, launching over 550 drones in a single day as weather shifts favor Moscow. These developments illustrate escalating global tensions, with tech companies and governments alike facing pressure to address accountability and safety.

In other news, alpha-gal syndrome—a tick-borne red meat allergy—has spread across the U.S., affecting an estimated 450,000 people. The CDC warns of rising cases linked to lone star ticks, with symptoms ranging from digestive issues to life-threatening reactions. Public health officials urge awareness and prevention measures as the condition becomes a growing concern.