In the fast-paced world of software development, the allure of new technologies can often overshadow practical considerations. A seasoned developer reflects on choosing PHP and PostgreSQL over trendier stacks, emphasizing the need for software that lasts longer than fleeting trends. The developer highlights three pitfalls of what they call 'NewDev' bias: the belief that newer technologies are inherently better, the tendency to add unnecessary complexity, and the focus on technologies that impress potential employers rather than serve business needs.

The article delves into real-world examples of these biases, such as a company spending 200k USD to migrate an ERP system to a newer framework with no added functionality. It also critiques the over-engineering of systems, where developers add layers of architecture that increase latency and points of failure. This is a call to prioritize stability and simplicity in software development, ensuring that systems can be maintained over decades, not just months.

To combat these biases, the author advocates for 'principles over tools,' recommending stable, mature technologies with minimal dependencies. This approach, while perhaps not as exciting on paper, ensures that software systems are reliable, maintainable, and can withstand the test of time. The developer concludes by questioning the true value of adopting new technologies and encourages a shift in perspective from one of technological novelty to one of business pragmatism.