An article from Atlas Press argues that new books are often not worth reading. The author contends that contemporary authors, particularly academics, lack the diverse life experiences of historical figures. They suggest that modern authors, shaped by similar educational institutions, tend to share homogenous perspectives, making their work less insightful than that of past writers.

The central argument pivots on the idea that valuable information comes from understanding the human condition through a wide range of experiences. The author contrasts modern academics with figures like Xenophon, implying that modern writings lack the depth and breadth of older texts. The article suggests focusing on books written before the 20th century to gain authentic perspectives.

The author's perspective is partly a critique of the modern publishing world. They imply that the emphasis on entertainment in reading has diminished the value of books. With modern entertainment options like Netflix and video games, books struggle to compete. The author implies that books should be read to gain knowledge and understanding of the human condition.

Ultimately, the article's core message is a call to prioritize older texts for their varied perspectives and deeper insights on the human condition. It also subtly critiques the current state of academia and publishing, implying a lack of unique voices and diverse experiences in contemporary literature. The author recommends reading books written before World War 2.