A Hacker News contributor sketches a billionaire‑level vision for a next‑generation code forge, sparked by recent criticism of GitHub after Ghostty’s departure. The author argues that modern platforms—GitHub, GitLab, and Gitea—repeat the same design flaws, layering heavyweight workflows atop Git’s simple distributed model.

Key pain points include pre‑commit feedback loops, binary pull‑request approvals, and rigid review processes that ignore emerging tools like LLMs. The writer proposes enforced remote pre‑commit checks, nuanced approval states, and stacked pull requests as first‑class entities, reducing bottlenecks that waste senior engineers’ time.

The manifesto also calls for modular hosting units small enough to run on a Raspberry Pi, shallow clones with on‑demand history fetching, and signed, offline‑runnable actions. By decoupling issue tracking and wiki features from the core forge, developers could assemble a lean, secure environment tailored to modern CI/CD and AI‑assisted workflows.