The author expresses skepticism about AI/agent software being vaporware, citing friction in the ecosystem and poor execution. Despite innovative ideas, tools like ONA face usability issues and high costs. The marketing often overpromises, leaving users frustrated with unresolved technical barriers.

ONA, a platform aiming to automate software development, struggled with login problems and inefficient resource use. The author paid $20 in 'ona compute units' for minimal progress, highlighting execution flaws. These experiences reinforce doubts about the practicality of agentic development tools.

The core issue lies in the gap between marketing claims and reality. Engineers prioritize code generation over user experience, leading to redundant integrations and billing complexities. While the concept of AI handling non-coding tasks is appealing, current implementations add layers of friction. The author remains willing to pay for functional tools but demands practical execution over polished pitches.